The Dynamics of Daubert: Methodology, Conclusions, and Fit in Statistical and Econometric Studies

In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993), the Supreme Court concluded that the Federal Rules of Evidence dispense with the "general acceptance" standard that previously dominated the field. This paper proposes at least partial solutions to the boundary and usurpation problems...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Virginia law review 2001-12, Vol.87 (8), p.1933-2018
1. Verfasser:	Kaye, D. H.
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Appellate courts Comments Defendants Econometrics Economic statistics Empirical evidence Evidence Federal court decisions Federal district courts Federal Rules of Evidence Juries Legal evidence Market share Plaintiffs Regression analysis Statistics Supreme Court decisions
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	2018
container_issue	8
container_start_page	1933
container_title	Virginia law review
container_volume	87
creator	Kaye, D. H.
description	In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993), the Supreme Court concluded that the Federal Rules of Evidence dispense with the "general acceptance" standard that previously dominated the field. This paper proposes at least partial solutions to the boundary and usurpation problems, and it applies them to statistical and econometric proof. In addition, it reviews the developments that have culminated in the modern use of sophisticated statistical equations and models to prove factual claims.
doi_str_mv	10.2307/1073909
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_205299313</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1073909</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1073909</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-b30312498e03b8e115c77373706b5a6b04aa2aa59a7cd9055e5c5e8a0d2190a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKv4FYIIXlqdJJvNxpv0jwoVD9bzMptNbcp2U5Psod_e1fYq7zCPNz9m4BFyzeCeC1APDJTQoE_IgOmMj7XO1SkZAPQ-z4Gdk4sYNwCgikwOCC7Xlk73LW6didSv6BS7yob0SN9sWvvaN_5rP6IT35qmi863cUSxrencJepa-pEwuZicweYvnhnf-q1NwZl-19XOxktytsIm2qvjHJLP-Ww5eRkv3p9fJ0-LseFKp3ElQDCe6cKCqArLmDRKiV6QVxLzCjJEjig1KlNrkNJKI22BUHOmAUEMyc3h7i74787GVG58F9r-ZclBcq0FEz10d4BM8DEGuyp3wW0x7EsG5W995bG-nrw9kJuYfPgX-wES52uO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205299313</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Dynamics of Daubert: Methodology, Conclusions, and Fit in Statistical and Econometric Studies</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Kaye, D. H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaye, D. H.</creatorcontrib><description>In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993), the Supreme Court concluded that the Federal Rules of Evidence dispense with the "general acceptance" standard that previously dominated the field. This paper proposes at least partial solutions to the boundary and usurpation problems, and it applies them to statistical and econometric proof. In addition, it reviews the developments that have culminated in the modern use of sophisticated statistical equations and models to prove factual claims.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-6601</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-9967</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1073909</identifier><identifier>CODEN: VLIBAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Charlottesville: Virginia Law Review Association</publisher><subject>Appellate courts ; Comments ; Defendants ; Econometrics ; Economic statistics ; Empirical evidence ; Evidence ; Federal court decisions ; Federal district courts ; Federal Rules of Evidence ; Juries ; Legal evidence ; Market share ; Plaintiffs ; Regression analysis ; Statistics ; Supreme Court decisions</subject><ispartof>Virginia law review, 2001-12, Vol.87 (8), p.1933-2018</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2001 Virginia Law Review Association</rights><rights>Copyright Virginia Law Review Association Dec 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-b30312498e03b8e115c77373706b5a6b04aa2aa59a7cd9055e5c5e8a0d2190a03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1073909$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1073909$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaye, D. H.</creatorcontrib><title>The Dynamics of Daubert: Methodology, Conclusions, and Fit in Statistical and Econometric Studies</title><title>Virginia law review</title><description>In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993), the Supreme Court concluded that the Federal Rules of Evidence dispense with the "general acceptance" standard that previously dominated the field. This paper proposes at least partial solutions to the boundary and usurpation problems, and it applies them to statistical and econometric proof. In addition, it reviews the developments that have culminated in the modern use of sophisticated statistical equations and models to prove factual claims.</description><subject>Appellate courts</subject><subject>Comments</subject><subject>Defendants</subject><subject>Econometrics</subject><subject>Economic statistics</subject><subject>Empirical evidence</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Federal court decisions</subject><subject>Federal district courts</subject><subject>Federal Rules of Evidence</subject><subject>Juries</subject><subject>Legal evidence</subject><subject>Market share</subject><subject>Plaintiffs</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Supreme Court decisions</subject><issn>0042-6601</issn><issn>1942-9967</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKv4FYIIXlqdJJvNxpv0jwoVD9bzMptNbcp2U5Psod_e1fYq7zCPNz9m4BFyzeCeC1APDJTQoE_IgOmMj7XO1SkZAPQ-z4Gdk4sYNwCgikwOCC7Xlk73LW6didSv6BS7yob0SN9sWvvaN_5rP6IT35qmi863cUSxrencJepa-pEwuZicweYvnhnf-q1NwZl-19XOxktytsIm2qvjHJLP-Ww5eRkv3p9fJ0-LseFKp3ElQDCe6cKCqArLmDRKiV6QVxLzCjJEjig1KlNrkNJKI22BUHOmAUEMyc3h7i74787GVG58F9r-ZclBcq0FEz10d4BM8DEGuyp3wW0x7EsG5W995bG-nrw9kJuYfPgX-wES52uO</recordid><startdate>20011201</startdate><enddate>20011201</enddate><creator>Kaye, D. H.</creator><general>Virginia Law Review Association</general><general>The Virginia Law Review Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011201</creationdate><title>The Dynamics of Daubert: Methodology, Conclusions, and Fit in Statistical and Econometric Studies</title><author>Kaye, D. H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-b30312498e03b8e115c77373706b5a6b04aa2aa59a7cd9055e5c5e8a0d2190a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Appellate courts</topic><topic>Comments</topic><topic>Defendants</topic><topic>Econometrics</topic><topic>Economic statistics</topic><topic>Empirical evidence</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Federal court decisions</topic><topic>Federal district courts</topic><topic>Federal Rules of Evidence</topic><topic>Juries</topic><topic>Legal evidence</topic><topic>Market share</topic><topic>Plaintiffs</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Supreme Court decisions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaye, D. H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Virginia law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaye, D. H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Dynamics of Daubert: Methodology, Conclusions, and Fit in Statistical and Econometric Studies</atitle><jtitle>Virginia law review</jtitle><date>2001-12-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1933</spage><epage>2018</epage><pages>1933-2018</pages><issn>0042-6601</issn><eissn>1942-9967</eissn><coden>VLIBAD</coden><abstract>In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993), the Supreme Court concluded that the Federal Rules of Evidence dispense with the "general acceptance" standard that previously dominated the field. This paper proposes at least partial solutions to the boundary and usurpation problems, and it applies them to statistical and econometric proof. In addition, it reviews the developments that have culminated in the modern use of sophisticated statistical equations and models to prove factual claims.</abstract><cop>Charlottesville</cop><pub>Virginia Law Review Association</pub><doi>10.2307/1073909</doi><tpages>86</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0042-6601
ispartof	Virginia law review, 2001-12, Vol.87 (8), p.1933-2018
issn	0042-6601 1942-9967
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_journals_205299313
source	JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects	Appellate courts Comments Defendants Econometrics Economic statistics Empirical evidence Evidence Federal court decisions Federal district courts Federal Rules of Evidence Juries Legal evidence Market share Plaintiffs Regression analysis Statistics Supreme Court decisions
title	The Dynamics of Daubert: Methodology, Conclusions, and Fit in Statistical and Econometric Studies
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T06%3A37%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Dynamics%20of%20Daubert:%20Methodology,%20Conclusions,%20and%20Fit%20in%20Statistical%20and%20Econometric%20Studies&rft.jtitle=Virginia%20law%20review&rft.au=Kaye,%20D.%20H.&rft.date=2001-12-01&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1933&rft.epage=2018&rft.pages=1933-2018&rft.issn=0042-6601&rft.eissn=1942-9967&rft.coden=VLIBAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1073909&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1073909%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205299313&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1073909&rfr_iscdi=true