Colorectal cancer screening/The authors respond

In their editorial on screening for colorectal cancer, Alan Barkun and Ken Flegel exaggerated the screening rate for this disease in the United States.1 They cited a survey in which adults over 50 years of age were asked if they had ever undergone fecal occult blood testing, sigmoidoscopy or colonos...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ) 2008-03, Vol.178 (6), p.731
Hauptverfasser: Preshaw, Roy M, Barkun, Alan, Flegel, Ken
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In their editorial on screening for colorectal cancer, Alan Barkun and Ken Flegel exaggerated the screening rate for this disease in the United States.1 They cited a survey in which adults over 50 years of age were asked if they had ever undergone fecal occult blood testing, sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy.2 Sixty-three percent of the respondents replied that they had; Barkun and Flegel cited this figure as evidence of greater uptake of screening in the United States. However, only 37% of the respondents in that study were defined as being "current for testing" (that is, they claimed to have undergone fecal occult blood testing in the past year, sigmoidoscopy in the past 5 years or colonoscopy in the last 10 years). This survey was subject to recall bias in 2 ways: some respondents might have wanted to show that they were aware of current screening recommendations (and thus they would have responded falsely that they had been screened) and some might have responded that they had been screened when in fact they had undergone these tests for investigation rather than screening purposes.
ISSN:0820-3946
1488-2329