Heidegger und Maihofer: das Sein als
The British Philosopher Bernard Williams has drawn our attention to a strange logical phenomenon: From sentences such as “He is a good physician” we cannot infer “He is a good man”, whereas from “He is a healthy physician.” we can infer: “He is a healthy man.” We find a counterpart to this observati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 2012-06, Vol.98 (2), p.255-262 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | ger |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The British Philosopher Bernard Williams has drawn our attention to a strange logical phenomenon: From sentences such as “He is a good physician” we cannot infer “He is a good man”, whereas from “He is a healthy physician.” we can infer: “He is a healthy man.” We find a counterpart to this observation in Platon’s dialogue Menon. Menon, when asked by Socrates to define “virtue”, insists that there is no common virtue, be it for man or woman or for any other social role. Different again is according to Menon the concept of health. It is identical for men and women. Why these differences? “Good” or “virtue” when used as above do not attribute something to a (human) being, but constitute a different sort of being - a social role. Those words mean the constituent of a role, its “Sein des Seienden” in the language of Heidegger or the early Maihofer. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0001-2343 2363-5606 2363-5614 |