OC-045 Antroduodenal manometry: impact on clinical management

IntroductionAntroduodenal Manometry (ADM) is a key tool in the characterisation of upper gut motility.1 However the technique is not widely employed in the UK and data demonstrating the impact of short-term stationary manometry on clinical management are sparse.AimTo evaluate the clinical outcome an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gut 2010-04, Vol.59 (Suppl 1), p.A18
Hauptverfasser: Mahesh, V N, Unsworth, B, Wrightham, E, Lal, S, Mclaughlin, J, Shaffer, J, Paine, P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:IntroductionAntroduodenal Manometry (ADM) is a key tool in the characterisation of upper gut motility.1 However the technique is not widely employed in the UK and data demonstrating the impact of short-term stationary manometry on clinical management are sparse.AimTo evaluate the clinical outcome and impact of short-term stationary ADM in patients with suspected upper gut dysmotility in a tertiary hospital.MethodsA retrospective review of all patients undergoing ADM between August 2006 to November 2009 was conducted. After an overnight fast a single water perfused catheter with 8 sensors was passed per nares to 90 to 110 cms, with the flow rate controlled at 0.4 ml/min/sensor. Migrating Motor Complexes (MMC) and phase 1, 2 and 3 contractions were recorded in the fasted state (3 h), then post prandially following a standard feed (Ensure Plus 220 ml; 1–2 h). Parameters included frequency, amplitude and propagation.Results55 patients were included (43 female (78%), 12 male (22%), mean age 43 years, range 18–75). Eleven were external referrals solely for this investigation so complete clinical records were available in 44 patients. Their predominant symptoms were persistent nausea and vomiting in 28 (51%); abdominal pain in 10 (18%), distension 5 (9%) and others 12 (22%) including constipation, diarrhoea, early satiety, intolerance to enteral tube feeds. Clinical indications for the study were primarily diagnostic in 49 (89%), subclassification of known dysmotility in 2 (4%) and assessment for generalised dysmotility in patients with colonic dysmotility 4(7%).ADM was abnormal in 34 (62%) patients. Abnormal findings were most common in patients with persistent nausea and vomiting (19/28, 68%), abdominal pain (6/10, 60%) and colonic dysfunction (3/5, 60%). Key manometric diagnoses are presented in Abstract 045.In patients with complete data (n=44), the manometric findings led directly to a positive change in management in 28 (64%), including commencement of a liquid diet (n=6), initiation (n=3) or withdrawal (n=2) of enteral tube feeding, initiation and/or continuation of total parenteral nutrition (n=6), or avoidance of colonic surgery (n=2). Abstract OC-045Manometric diagnosesDiagnosisPatient (n=55)Percentage (%)Normal2138Myopathic disorder713Antral hypomotility815Generalised hypomotility47Neuropathic disorder35Rumination syndrome12Abnormal- unclassified1120 ConclusionShort term, stationary manometry influences diagnosis and management of refractory symptoms s
ISSN:0017-5749
1468-3288
DOI:10.1136/gut.2009.208959s