Comments on Michael Richardson's article

Michael Richardson's fine essay makes clear the Australian interest in engaging in the 2005 East Asian Summit. He also explains the advantages for the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) in incorporating Australia and New Zealand in this way. He lists the current substance of Austra...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Australian journal of international affairs 2005-09, Vol.59 (3), p.367-373
1. Verfasser: Milner, Anthony
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 373
container_issue 3
container_start_page 367
container_title Australian journal of international affairs
container_volume 59
creator Milner, Anthony
description Michael Richardson's fine essay makes clear the Australian interest in engaging in the 2005 East Asian Summit. He also explains the advantages for the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) in incorporating Australia and New Zealand in this way. He lists the current substance of Australian -ASEAN relations-economic diplomacy, flow of visitors, numbers of Asian students in Australia, number of Australians working in the region, and so forth. Australia's main export destination, of course, is Japan; China is now second. It is striking that the United States is less important in trade for Australia than it is for many Asian countries.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/10357710500231115
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_rmit_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_204226125</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/ielapa.200509748</informt_id><sourcerecordid>59689924</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c553t-552fb88f42468126315b979fb38187c788bb537e8a1625d8669ea67f632f6163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1L7DAUhoso-PkD3A0urm6qOUnzUbgbGfyCEUFcuAtpmziRtulNMuj8ezPWhdxh0FUC53mfnLxZdgzoHJBAF4AI5RwQRQgTAKBb2R4UjOaE4OftdE_zPAFiN9sP4RUhwEVJ97Kzqes63ccwcf3k3tZzpdvJ4-r0TXD9aZgoH23d6sNsx6g26KOv8yB7ur56mt7ms4ebu-nlLK8pJTGnFJtKCFPgggnAjACtSl6aiggQvOZCVBUlXAsFDNNGMFZqxbhhBBsGjBxkf0bt4N2_hQ5RdjbUum1Vr90iSFoyUZa4SODJf-CrW_g-rSYxKjBmgGmCYIRq70Lw2sjB2075pQQkV73Jtd5S5nrM-M5GqQZlopzHOATZqKik7Y37nDj_IhtnVyZCgEmr2wSnx5Or5IVIotvvohcbhiiDVr6eb7Z8YRhhQOkfqCBEoKSarat-s9QmHR91Y069Od82Mqpl67zxqq9tWC9GxveYkn9_TJLN3X4AjQfM-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204226125</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comments on Michael Richardson's article</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><creator>Milner, Anthony</creator><creatorcontrib>Milner, Anthony</creatorcontrib><description>Michael Richardson's fine essay makes clear the Australian interest in engaging in the 2005 East Asian Summit. He also explains the advantages for the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) in incorporating Australia and New Zealand in this way. He lists the current substance of Australian -ASEAN relations-economic diplomacy, flow of visitors, numbers of Asian students in Australia, number of Australians working in the region, and so forth. Australia's main export destination, of course, is Japan; China is now second. It is striking that the United States is less important in trade for Australia than it is for many Asian countries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1035-7718</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-332X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10357710500231115</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canberra: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>ASEAN ; Australia ; Australia: Foreign relations ; Australia: Politics and government ; Bush administration ; Coalition governments ; Democracy ; Diplomacy ; DIPLOMATS ; East Asia ; FOREIGN POLICY ; Howard government ; International Alliances ; International commerce ; International relations ; International Trade ; New Zealand ; Political theory ; Richardson, Michael ; Southeast Asia ; Southeast Asia: Foreign relations ; Summit conferences ; TARIFFS ; Treaty of Amity and Cooperation</subject><ispartof>Australian journal of international affairs, 2005-09, Vol.59 (3), p.367-373</ispartof><rights>Copyright Australian Institute of International Affairs 2005</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd. Sep 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Milner, Anthony</creatorcontrib><title>Comments on Michael Richardson's article</title><title>Australian journal of international affairs</title><description>Michael Richardson's fine essay makes clear the Australian interest in engaging in the 2005 East Asian Summit. He also explains the advantages for the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) in incorporating Australia and New Zealand in this way. He lists the current substance of Australian -ASEAN relations-economic diplomacy, flow of visitors, numbers of Asian students in Australia, number of Australians working in the region, and so forth. Australia's main export destination, of course, is Japan; China is now second. It is striking that the United States is less important in trade for Australia than it is for many Asian countries.</description><subject>ASEAN</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Australia: Foreign relations</subject><subject>Australia: Politics and government</subject><subject>Bush administration</subject><subject>Coalition governments</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Diplomacy</subject><subject>DIPLOMATS</subject><subject>East Asia</subject><subject>FOREIGN POLICY</subject><subject>Howard government</subject><subject>International Alliances</subject><subject>International commerce</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>International Trade</subject><subject>New Zealand</subject><subject>Political theory</subject><subject>Richardson, Michael</subject><subject>Southeast Asia</subject><subject>Southeast Asia: Foreign relations</subject><subject>Summit conferences</subject><subject>TARIFFS</subject><subject>Treaty of Amity and Cooperation</subject><issn>1035-7718</issn><issn>1465-332X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1L7DAUhoso-PkD3A0urm6qOUnzUbgbGfyCEUFcuAtpmziRtulNMuj8ezPWhdxh0FUC53mfnLxZdgzoHJBAF4AI5RwQRQgTAKBb2R4UjOaE4OftdE_zPAFiN9sP4RUhwEVJ97Kzqes63ccwcf3k3tZzpdvJ4-r0TXD9aZgoH23d6sNsx6g26KOv8yB7ur56mt7ms4ebu-nlLK8pJTGnFJtKCFPgggnAjACtSl6aiggQvOZCVBUlXAsFDNNGMFZqxbhhBBsGjBxkf0bt4N2_hQ5RdjbUum1Vr90iSFoyUZa4SODJf-CrW_g-rSYxKjBmgGmCYIRq70Lw2sjB2075pQQkV73Jtd5S5nrM-M5GqQZlopzHOATZqKik7Y37nDj_IhtnVyZCgEmr2wSnx5Or5IVIotvvohcbhiiDVr6eb7Z8YRhhQOkfqCBEoKSarat-s9QmHR91Y069Od82Mqpl67zxqq9tWC9GxveYkn9_TJLN3X4AjQfM-w</recordid><startdate>20050901</startdate><enddate>20050901</enddate><creator>Milner, Anthony</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050901</creationdate><title>Comments on Michael Richardson's article</title><author>Milner, Anthony</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c553t-552fb88f42468126315b979fb38187c788bb537e8a1625d8669ea67f632f6163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>ASEAN</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Australia: Foreign relations</topic><topic>Australia: Politics and government</topic><topic>Bush administration</topic><topic>Coalition governments</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Diplomacy</topic><topic>DIPLOMATS</topic><topic>East Asia</topic><topic>FOREIGN POLICY</topic><topic>Howard government</topic><topic>International Alliances</topic><topic>International commerce</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>International Trade</topic><topic>New Zealand</topic><topic>Political theory</topic><topic>Richardson, Michael</topic><topic>Southeast Asia</topic><topic>Southeast Asia: Foreign relations</topic><topic>Summit conferences</topic><topic>TARIFFS</topic><topic>Treaty of Amity and Cooperation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Milner, Anthony</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Australian journal of international affairs</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Milner, Anthony</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comments on Michael Richardson's article</atitle><jtitle>Australian journal of international affairs</jtitle><date>2005-09-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>367</spage><epage>373</epage><pages>367-373</pages><issn>1035-7718</issn><eissn>1465-332X</eissn><abstract>Michael Richardson's fine essay makes clear the Australian interest in engaging in the 2005 East Asian Summit. He also explains the advantages for the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) in incorporating Australia and New Zealand in this way. He lists the current substance of Australian -ASEAN relations-economic diplomacy, flow of visitors, numbers of Asian students in Australia, number of Australians working in the region, and so forth. Australia's main export destination, of course, is Japan; China is now second. It is striking that the United States is less important in trade for Australia than it is for many Asian countries.</abstract><cop>Canberra</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/10357710500231115</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1035-7718
ispartof Australian journal of international affairs, 2005-09, Vol.59 (3), p.367-373
issn 1035-7718
1465-332X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_204226125
source PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete
subjects ASEAN
Australia
Australia: Foreign relations
Australia: Politics and government
Bush administration
Coalition governments
Democracy
Diplomacy
DIPLOMATS
East Asia
FOREIGN POLICY
Howard government
International Alliances
International commerce
International relations
International Trade
New Zealand
Political theory
Richardson, Michael
Southeast Asia
Southeast Asia: Foreign relations
Summit conferences
TARIFFS
Treaty of Amity and Cooperation
title Comments on Michael Richardson's article
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T03%3A38%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_rmit_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comments%20on%20Michael%20Richardson's%20article&rft.jtitle=Australian%20journal%20of%20international%20affairs&rft.au=Milner,%20Anthony&rft.date=2005-09-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=367&rft.epage=373&rft.pages=367-373&rft.issn=1035-7718&rft.eissn=1465-332X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10357710500231115&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_rmit_%3E59689924%3C/proquest_rmit_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204226125&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/ielapa.200509748&rfr_iscdi=true