Comments on Michael Richardson's article
Michael Richardson's fine essay makes clear the Australian interest in engaging in the 2005 East Asian Summit. He also explains the advantages for the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) in incorporating Australia and New Zealand in this way. He lists the current substance of Austra...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Australian journal of international affairs 2005-09, Vol.59 (3), p.367-373 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 373 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 367 |
container_title | Australian journal of international affairs |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Milner, Anthony |
description | Michael Richardson's fine essay makes clear the Australian interest in engaging in the 2005 East Asian Summit. He also explains the advantages for the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) in incorporating Australia and New Zealand in this way. He lists the current substance of Australian -ASEAN relations-economic diplomacy, flow of visitors, numbers of Asian students in Australia, number of Australians working in the region, and so forth. Australia's main export destination, of course, is Japan; China is now second. It is striking that the United States is less important in trade for Australia than it is for many Asian countries. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/10357710500231115 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_rmit_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_204226125</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/ielapa.200509748</informt_id><sourcerecordid>59689924</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c553t-552fb88f42468126315b979fb38187c788bb537e8a1625d8669ea67f632f6163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1L7DAUhoso-PkD3A0urm6qOUnzUbgbGfyCEUFcuAtpmziRtulNMuj8ezPWhdxh0FUC53mfnLxZdgzoHJBAF4AI5RwQRQgTAKBb2R4UjOaE4OftdE_zPAFiN9sP4RUhwEVJ97Kzqes63ccwcf3k3tZzpdvJ4-r0TXD9aZgoH23d6sNsx6g26KOv8yB7ur56mt7ms4ebu-nlLK8pJTGnFJtKCFPgggnAjACtSl6aiggQvOZCVBUlXAsFDNNGMFZqxbhhBBsGjBxkf0bt4N2_hQ5RdjbUum1Vr90iSFoyUZa4SODJf-CrW_g-rSYxKjBmgGmCYIRq70Lw2sjB2075pQQkV73Jtd5S5nrM-M5GqQZlopzHOATZqKik7Y37nDj_IhtnVyZCgEmr2wSnx5Or5IVIotvvohcbhiiDVr6eb7Z8YRhhQOkfqCBEoKSarat-s9QmHR91Y069Od82Mqpl67zxqq9tWC9GxveYkn9_TJLN3X4AjQfM-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204226125</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comments on Michael Richardson's article</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><creator>Milner, Anthony</creator><creatorcontrib>Milner, Anthony</creatorcontrib><description>Michael Richardson's fine essay makes clear the Australian interest in engaging in the 2005 East Asian Summit. He also explains the advantages for the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) in incorporating Australia and New Zealand in this way. He lists the current substance of Australian -ASEAN relations-economic diplomacy, flow of visitors, numbers of Asian students in Australia, number of Australians working in the region, and so forth. Australia's main export destination, of course, is Japan; China is now second. It is striking that the United States is less important in trade for Australia than it is for many Asian countries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1035-7718</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-332X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10357710500231115</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canberra: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>ASEAN ; Australia ; Australia: Foreign relations ; Australia: Politics and government ; Bush administration ; Coalition governments ; Democracy ; Diplomacy ; DIPLOMATS ; East Asia ; FOREIGN POLICY ; Howard government ; International Alliances ; International commerce ; International relations ; International Trade ; New Zealand ; Political theory ; Richardson, Michael ; Southeast Asia ; Southeast Asia: Foreign relations ; Summit conferences ; TARIFFS ; Treaty of Amity and Cooperation</subject><ispartof>Australian journal of international affairs, 2005-09, Vol.59 (3), p.367-373</ispartof><rights>Copyright Australian Institute of International Affairs 2005</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Ltd. Sep 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Milner, Anthony</creatorcontrib><title>Comments on Michael Richardson's article</title><title>Australian journal of international affairs</title><description>Michael Richardson's fine essay makes clear the Australian interest in engaging in the 2005 East Asian Summit. He also explains the advantages for the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) in incorporating Australia and New Zealand in this way. He lists the current substance of Australian -ASEAN relations-economic diplomacy, flow of visitors, numbers of Asian students in Australia, number of Australians working in the region, and so forth. Australia's main export destination, of course, is Japan; China is now second. It is striking that the United States is less important in trade for Australia than it is for many Asian countries.</description><subject>ASEAN</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Australia: Foreign relations</subject><subject>Australia: Politics and government</subject><subject>Bush administration</subject><subject>Coalition governments</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Diplomacy</subject><subject>DIPLOMATS</subject><subject>East Asia</subject><subject>FOREIGN POLICY</subject><subject>Howard government</subject><subject>International Alliances</subject><subject>International commerce</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>International Trade</subject><subject>New Zealand</subject><subject>Political theory</subject><subject>Richardson, Michael</subject><subject>Southeast Asia</subject><subject>Southeast Asia: Foreign relations</subject><subject>Summit conferences</subject><subject>TARIFFS</subject><subject>Treaty of Amity and Cooperation</subject><issn>1035-7718</issn><issn>1465-332X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1L7DAUhoso-PkD3A0urm6qOUnzUbgbGfyCEUFcuAtpmziRtulNMuj8ezPWhdxh0FUC53mfnLxZdgzoHJBAF4AI5RwQRQgTAKBb2R4UjOaE4OftdE_zPAFiN9sP4RUhwEVJ97Kzqes63ccwcf3k3tZzpdvJ4-r0TXD9aZgoH23d6sNsx6g26KOv8yB7ur56mt7ms4ebu-nlLK8pJTGnFJtKCFPgggnAjACtSl6aiggQvOZCVBUlXAsFDNNGMFZqxbhhBBsGjBxkf0bt4N2_hQ5RdjbUum1Vr90iSFoyUZa4SODJf-CrW_g-rSYxKjBmgGmCYIRq70Lw2sjB2075pQQkV73Jtd5S5nrM-M5GqQZlopzHOATZqKik7Y37nDj_IhtnVyZCgEmr2wSnx5Or5IVIotvvohcbhiiDVr6eb7Z8YRhhQOkfqCBEoKSarat-s9QmHR91Y069Od82Mqpl67zxqq9tWC9GxveYkn9_TJLN3X4AjQfM-w</recordid><startdate>20050901</startdate><enddate>20050901</enddate><creator>Milner, Anthony</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050901</creationdate><title>Comments on Michael Richardson's article</title><author>Milner, Anthony</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c553t-552fb88f42468126315b979fb38187c788bb537e8a1625d8669ea67f632f6163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>ASEAN</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Australia: Foreign relations</topic><topic>Australia: Politics and government</topic><topic>Bush administration</topic><topic>Coalition governments</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Diplomacy</topic><topic>DIPLOMATS</topic><topic>East Asia</topic><topic>FOREIGN POLICY</topic><topic>Howard government</topic><topic>International Alliances</topic><topic>International commerce</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>International Trade</topic><topic>New Zealand</topic><topic>Political theory</topic><topic>Richardson, Michael</topic><topic>Southeast Asia</topic><topic>Southeast Asia: Foreign relations</topic><topic>Summit conferences</topic><topic>TARIFFS</topic><topic>Treaty of Amity and Cooperation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Milner, Anthony</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Australian journal of international affairs</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Milner, Anthony</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comments on Michael Richardson's article</atitle><jtitle>Australian journal of international affairs</jtitle><date>2005-09-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>367</spage><epage>373</epage><pages>367-373</pages><issn>1035-7718</issn><eissn>1465-332X</eissn><abstract>Michael Richardson's fine essay makes clear the Australian interest in engaging in the 2005 East Asian Summit. He also explains the advantages for the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) in incorporating Australia and New Zealand in this way. He lists the current substance of Australian -ASEAN relations-economic diplomacy, flow of visitors, numbers of Asian students in Australia, number of Australians working in the region, and so forth. Australia's main export destination, of course, is Japan; China is now second. It is striking that the United States is less important in trade for Australia than it is for many Asian countries.</abstract><cop>Canberra</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/10357710500231115</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1035-7718 |
ispartof | Australian journal of international affairs, 2005-09, Vol.59 (3), p.367-373 |
issn | 1035-7718 1465-332X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_204226125 |
source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete |
subjects | ASEAN Australia Australia: Foreign relations Australia: Politics and government Bush administration Coalition governments Democracy Diplomacy DIPLOMATS East Asia FOREIGN POLICY Howard government International Alliances International commerce International relations International Trade New Zealand Political theory Richardson, Michael Southeast Asia Southeast Asia: Foreign relations Summit conferences TARIFFS Treaty of Amity and Cooperation |
title | Comments on Michael Richardson's article |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T03%3A38%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_rmit_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comments%20on%20Michael%20Richardson's%20article&rft.jtitle=Australian%20journal%20of%20international%20affairs&rft.au=Milner,%20Anthony&rft.date=2005-09-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=367&rft.epage=373&rft.pages=367-373&rft.issn=1035-7718&rft.eissn=1465-332X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10357710500231115&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_rmit_%3E59689924%3C/proquest_rmit_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204226125&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/ielapa.200509748&rfr_iscdi=true |