Optimal ordering policies when the supplier provides a progressive interest scheme
In fact, most credit card issuers (or home equity banks) frequently offer cardholders (or customers) a teaser interest rate (say, I 1), which is significantly lower than the regular interest rate of I 2 (with I 2 > I 1) for only 6 months or a year (say, M 2) to lure new customers from their compe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of operational research 2007-06, Vol.179 (2), p.404-413 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In fact, most credit card issuers (or home equity banks) frequently offer cardholders (or customers) a teaser interest rate (say,
I
1), which is significantly lower than the regular interest rate of
I
2 (with
I
2
>
I
1) for only 6
months or a year (say,
M
2) to lure new customers from their competitors. Consequently, the customer faces a progressive interest charge from the bank. If the customer pays the outstanding balance by the grace period (say,
M
1 which is generally 25
days), then the bank does not charge any interest. If the outstanding amount is paid after
M
1, but by
M
2 (with
M
2
>
M
1), then the bank charges the customer the teaser interest rate of
I
1 on the unpaid balance. If the customer pays the outstanding amount after
M
2, then the bank charges the regular interest rate of
I
2. In this paper, we first establish an appropriate EOQ model for a retailer when the bank (or the supplier) offers a progressive interest charge, and then provide an easy-to-use closed-form solution to the problem. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0377-2217 1872-6860 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.03.037 |