Optimal ordering policies when the supplier provides a progressive interest scheme

In fact, most credit card issuers (or home equity banks) frequently offer cardholders (or customers) a teaser interest rate (say, I 1), which is significantly lower than the regular interest rate of I 2 (with I 2 > I 1) for only 6 months or a year (say, M 2) to lure new customers from their compe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of operational research 2007-06, Vol.179 (2), p.404-413
Hauptverfasser: Goyal, Suresh Kumar, Teng, Jinn-Tsair, Chang, Chun-Tao
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In fact, most credit card issuers (or home equity banks) frequently offer cardholders (or customers) a teaser interest rate (say, I 1), which is significantly lower than the regular interest rate of I 2 (with I 2 > I 1) for only 6 months or a year (say, M 2) to lure new customers from their competitors. Consequently, the customer faces a progressive interest charge from the bank. If the customer pays the outstanding balance by the grace period (say, M 1 which is generally 25 days), then the bank does not charge any interest. If the outstanding amount is paid after M 1, but by M 2 (with M 2 > M 1), then the bank charges the customer the teaser interest rate of I 1 on the unpaid balance. If the customer pays the outstanding amount after M 2, then the bank charges the regular interest rate of I 2. In this paper, we first establish an appropriate EOQ model for a retailer when the bank (or the supplier) offers a progressive interest charge, and then provide an easy-to-use closed-form solution to the problem.
ISSN:0377-2217
1872-6860
DOI:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.03.037