Comparison of Management Faculty Perspectives on Quizzing and Its Alternatives
In this study, the author compares the views of faculty members who give quizzes and those who do not regarding (a) the potential drawbacks of quizzing and (b) the viability of various quiz alternatives such as graded homework. The results suggest that quizzers and nonquizzers have much in common an...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of education for business 2004-09, Vol.80 (1), p.5-9 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 9 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 5 |
| container_title | Journal of education for business |
| container_volume | 80 |
| creator | Bacdayan, Paul |
| description | In this study, the author compares the views of faculty members who give quizzes and those who do not regarding (a) the potential drawbacks of quizzing and (b) the viability of various quiz alternatives such as graded homework. The results suggest that quizzers and nonquizzers have much in common and that quizzing is simply one of a variety of potentially effective techniques for boosting student preparation. The author also presents data on typical quiz practices. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3200/JOEB.80.1.5-9 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_202821816</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ745231</ericid><sourcerecordid>736144841</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c205t-cb7c7e92b0315709f4fcf1ad34f9ca9fb344aef7e95e526e87ff3f532527d08c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0MFPwjAUBvDGaCKiR28eGu-br-3KuiMSUAiKJnpuSteSkW3FdtPAX-9wxpOnd_h--fLyIXRNIGYU4G6xmt7HAmIS8yg7QQOSJRAxxkenaABCsIgyys7RRQhbAOBA0gF6nrhqp3wRXI2dxU-qVhtTmbrBM6XbstnjF-PDzuim-DQBd-q1LQ6Hot5gVed43gQ8Lhvja_UDLtGZVWUwV793iN5n07fJY7RcPcwn42WkKfAm0utUpyaja2CEp5DZxGpLVM4Sm2mV2TVLEmVsR7jhdGREai2znFFO0xyEZkN02_fuvPtoTWjk1rXdE2WQFKigRJBRh6Ieae9C8MbKnS8q5feSgDwuJo-LSQGSSC6zzt_03vhC_9npIk04ZaSLRR8XtXW-Ul_Ol7ls1L503npV6yJI9n_zN1Lhe18</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>202821816</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Management Faculty Perspectives on Quizzing and Its Alternatives</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Bacdayan, Paul</creator><creatorcontrib>Bacdayan, Paul</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, the author compares the views of faculty members who give quizzes and those who do not regarding (a) the potential drawbacks of quizzing and (b) the viability of various quiz alternatives such as graded homework. The results suggest that quizzers and nonquizzers have much in common and that quizzing is simply one of a variety of potentially effective techniques for boosting student preparation. The author also presents data on typical quiz practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-2323</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1940-3356</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3200/JOEB.80.1.5-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Heldref</publisher><subject>Academic standards ; Alternatives ; Business Administration Education ; Business education ; Classroom Techniques ; College Faculty ; Comparative Analysis ; Educational Strategies ; Homework ; Learning Processes ; Motivation Techniques ; Pedagogy ; School faculty ; Student Behavior ; Student Motivation ; Students ; Teacher Attitudes ; Teacher evaluations ; Teacher Surveys ; Teaching ; Teaching Methods ; Tests ; Uniforms ; Workloads</subject><ispartof>Journal of education for business, 2004-09, Vol.80 (1), p.5-9</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2004</rights><rights>Copyright HELDREF PUBLICATIONS Sep/Oct 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c205t-cb7c7e92b0315709f4fcf1ad34f9ca9fb344aef7e95e526e87ff3f532527d08c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ745231$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bacdayan, Paul</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Management Faculty Perspectives on Quizzing and Its Alternatives</title><title>Journal of education for business</title><description>In this study, the author compares the views of faculty members who give quizzes and those who do not regarding (a) the potential drawbacks of quizzing and (b) the viability of various quiz alternatives such as graded homework. The results suggest that quizzers and nonquizzers have much in common and that quizzing is simply one of a variety of potentially effective techniques for boosting student preparation. The author also presents data on typical quiz practices.</description><subject>Academic standards</subject><subject>Alternatives</subject><subject>Business Administration Education</subject><subject>Business education</subject><subject>Classroom Techniques</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Educational Strategies</subject><subject>Homework</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Motivation Techniques</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>School faculty</subject><subject>Student Behavior</subject><subject>Student Motivation</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Teacher evaluations</subject><subject>Teacher Surveys</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Tests</subject><subject>Uniforms</subject><subject>Workloads</subject><issn>0883-2323</issn><issn>1940-3356</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0MFPwjAUBvDGaCKiR28eGu-br-3KuiMSUAiKJnpuSteSkW3FdtPAX-9wxpOnd_h--fLyIXRNIGYU4G6xmt7HAmIS8yg7QQOSJRAxxkenaABCsIgyys7RRQhbAOBA0gF6nrhqp3wRXI2dxU-qVhtTmbrBM6XbstnjF-PDzuim-DQBd-q1LQ6Hot5gVed43gQ8Lhvja_UDLtGZVWUwV793iN5n07fJY7RcPcwn42WkKfAm0utUpyaja2CEp5DZxGpLVM4Sm2mV2TVLEmVsR7jhdGREai2znFFO0xyEZkN02_fuvPtoTWjk1rXdE2WQFKigRJBRh6Ieae9C8MbKnS8q5feSgDwuJo-LSQGSSC6zzt_03vhC_9npIk04ZaSLRR8XtXW-Ul_Ol7ls1L503npV6yJI9n_zN1Lhe18</recordid><startdate>20040901</startdate><enddate>20040901</enddate><creator>Bacdayan, Paul</creator><general>Heldref</general><general>Heldref Publications</general><general>Taylor & Francis Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040901</creationdate><title>Comparison of Management Faculty Perspectives on Quizzing and Its Alternatives</title><author>Bacdayan, Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c205t-cb7c7e92b0315709f4fcf1ad34f9ca9fb344aef7e95e526e87ff3f532527d08c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Academic standards</topic><topic>Alternatives</topic><topic>Business Administration Education</topic><topic>Business education</topic><topic>Classroom Techniques</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Educational Strategies</topic><topic>Homework</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Motivation Techniques</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>School faculty</topic><topic>Student Behavior</topic><topic>Student Motivation</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Teacher evaluations</topic><topic>Teacher Surveys</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Tests</topic><topic>Uniforms</topic><topic>Workloads</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bacdayan, Paul</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of education for business</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bacdayan, Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ745231</ericid><atitle>Comparison of Management Faculty Perspectives on Quizzing and Its Alternatives</atitle><jtitle>Journal of education for business</jtitle><date>2004-09-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>5</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>5-9</pages><issn>0883-2323</issn><eissn>1940-3356</eissn><abstract>In this study, the author compares the views of faculty members who give quizzes and those who do not regarding (a) the potential drawbacks of quizzing and (b) the viability of various quiz alternatives such as graded homework. The results suggest that quizzers and nonquizzers have much in common and that quizzing is simply one of a variety of potentially effective techniques for boosting student preparation. The author also presents data on typical quiz practices.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Heldref</pub><doi>10.3200/JOEB.80.1.5-9</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0883-2323 |
| ispartof | Journal of education for business, 2004-09, Vol.80 (1), p.5-9 |
| issn | 0883-2323 1940-3356 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_202821816 |
| source | Business Source Complete; EBSCOhost Education Source |
| subjects | Academic standards Alternatives Business Administration Education Business education Classroom Techniques College Faculty Comparative Analysis Educational Strategies Homework Learning Processes Motivation Techniques Pedagogy School faculty Student Behavior Student Motivation Students Teacher Attitudes Teacher evaluations Teacher Surveys Teaching Teaching Methods Tests Uniforms Workloads |
| title | Comparison of Management Faculty Perspectives on Quizzing and Its Alternatives |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T00%3A44%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Management%20Faculty%20Perspectives%20on%20Quizzing%20and%20Its%20Alternatives&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20education%20for%20business&rft.au=Bacdayan,%20Paul&rft.date=2004-09-01&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=5&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=5-9&rft.issn=0883-2323&rft.eissn=1940-3356&rft_id=info:doi/10.3200/JOEB.80.1.5-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E736144841%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=202821816&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ745231&rfr_iscdi=true |