Political risks as firm-specific (dis)advantages: Evidence on transnational oil firms in Nigeria
The international business literature has recognized that political risk can be firm‐specific, but it has so far focused almost exclusively on the national business environment rather than the firm itself. Scholars have still largely confined firms to the role of relatively passive bystanders who, a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Thunderbird international business review 2003-09, Vol.45 (5), p.541-565 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The international business literature has recognized that political risk can be firm‐specific, but it has so far focused almost exclusively
on the national business environment rather than the firm itself. Scholars have still largely confined firms to the role of relatively passive
bystanders who, at best, can forecast political risks with some precision or guard against risk (e.g., through insurance). The basic
premise of this article, however, is that transnational corporations (TNCs) can be active actors capable of acquiring and upgrading
firm‐specific resources and capabilities for coping with or even benefiting from political risk. The research is based on the case of the
Nigerian oil industry. The research provides evidence to suggest that the same political events can have varying effects on different transnational
firms depending on their strategic resources and capabilities, and can benefit specific firms under certain circumstances. © 2003 Wiley
Periodicals, Inc. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1096-4762 1520-6874 |
DOI: | 10.1002/tie.10090 |