Optimizing estimates of annual variations and trends in geocenter motion and J2 from a combination of GRACE data and geophysical models

The focus of the study is optimizing the technique for estimating geocenter motion and variations in J2 by combining data from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite mission with output from an Ocean Bottom Pressure model and a Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) model. First,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth 2016-11, Vol.121 (11), p.8352-8370
Hauptverfasser: Sun, Yu, Riva, Riccardo, Ditmar, Pavel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The focus of the study is optimizing the technique for estimating geocenter motion and variations in J2 by combining data from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite mission with output from an Ocean Bottom Pressure model and a Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) model. First, we conduct an end‐to‐end numerical simulation study. We generate input time‐variable gravity field observations by perturbing a synthetic Earth model with realistically simulated errors. We show that it is important to avoid large errors at short wavelengths and signal leakage from land to ocean, as well as to account for self‐attraction and loading effects. Second, the optimal implementation strategy is applied to real GRACE data. We show that the estimates of annual amplitude in geocenter motion are in line with estimates from other techniques, such as satellite laser ranging (SLR) and global GPS inversion. At the same time, annual amplitudes of C10 and C11 are increased by about 50% and 20%, respectively, compared to estimates based on Swenson et al. (2008). Estimates of J2 variations are by about 15% larger than SLR results in terms of annual amplitude. Linear trend estimates are dependent on the adopted GIA model but still comparable to some SLR results. Key Points The GRACE‐OBP method of estimating geocenter motion and J2 is evaluated by means of an end‐to‐end numerical study Implementation details of this method are optimized for estimating annual variations and trend of geocenter motion and J2 time series Study explains past discrepancies between the results of GRACE‐OBP and SLR method, allowing for an elimination of them to a large extent
ISSN:2169-9313
2169-9356
DOI:10.1002/2016JB013073