Website accessibility: a cross-sector comparison
The Web has transformed the way organizations interact with clients, customers, and constituents. A large portion of these groups is often neglected, namely people with disabilities. This study compares federal government, non-profit organization (NPO), and corporate homepages accessibility to deter...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Universal access in the information society 2006-05, Vol.4 (4), p.393-399 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 399 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 393 |
| container_title | Universal access in the information society |
| container_volume | 4 |
| creator | Loiacono, Eleanor T. McCoy, Scott |
| description | The Web has transformed the way organizations interact with clients, customers, and constituents. A large portion of these groups is often neglected, namely people with disabilities. This study compares federal government, non-profit organization (NPO), and corporate homepages accessibility to determine how accessible these websites are to people with disabilities and how they compare to each other. The results indicate that federal homepages (23%), which are mandated to be accessible, are significantly more accessible than NPO (11%) and corporate homepages (6%). [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10209-005-0003-y |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_201607540</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1021855591</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c187t-85189bcaaa5525b46649cedf91eaeaddce2c471b1524b8c149d07b234a1084ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEFLAzEUhIMoWKs_wNviPfpeNtkk3qRoFQpeFI8hyWYhpW3WZHvYf-_WFQ_DzGGY9_gIuUW4RwD5UBAYaAogJkFNxzOywAYFFUzL8_-s9CW5KmULwFAhLgh8BVfiECrrfSgluriLw_hY2crnVAotwQ8pVz7te5tjSYdrctHZXQk3f74kny_PH6tXunlfv62eNtSjkgNVApV23lorBBOONw3XPrSdxmCDbVsfmOcSHQrGnfLIdQvSsZpbBMW7rl6Su3m3z-n7GMpgtumYD9NJwwAbkILDVMK59PtsDp3pc9zbPBoEc-JiZi5m4mJOXMxY_wD9rlWs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>201607540</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Website accessibility: a cross-sector comparison</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Loiacono, Eleanor T. ; McCoy, Scott</creator><creatorcontrib>Loiacono, Eleanor T. ; McCoy, Scott</creatorcontrib><description>The Web has transformed the way organizations interact with clients, customers, and constituents. A large portion of these groups is often neglected, namely people with disabilities. This study compares federal government, non-profit organization (NPO), and corporate homepages accessibility to determine how accessible these websites are to people with disabilities and how they compare to each other. The results indicate that federal homepages (23%), which are mandated to be accessible, are significantly more accessible than NPO (11%) and corporate homepages (6%). [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1615-5289</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-5297</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10209-005-0003-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Comparative studies ; Disabilities ; Government agencies ; Handicapped accessibility ; Internet access ; Nonprofit organizations ; Websites</subject><ispartof>Universal access in the information society, 2006-05, Vol.4 (4), p.393-399</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c187t-85189bcaaa5525b46649cedf91eaeaddce2c471b1524b8c149d07b234a1084ff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c187t-85189bcaaa5525b46649cedf91eaeaddce2c471b1524b8c149d07b234a1084ff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loiacono, Eleanor T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCoy, Scott</creatorcontrib><title>Website accessibility: a cross-sector comparison</title><title>Universal access in the information society</title><description>The Web has transformed the way organizations interact with clients, customers, and constituents. A large portion of these groups is often neglected, namely people with disabilities. This study compares federal government, non-profit organization (NPO), and corporate homepages accessibility to determine how accessible these websites are to people with disabilities and how they compare to each other. The results indicate that federal homepages (23%), which are mandated to be accessible, are significantly more accessible than NPO (11%) and corporate homepages (6%). [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Disabilities</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Handicapped accessibility</subject><subject>Internet access</subject><subject>Nonprofit organizations</subject><subject>Websites</subject><issn>1615-5289</issn><issn>1615-5297</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEFLAzEUhIMoWKs_wNviPfpeNtkk3qRoFQpeFI8hyWYhpW3WZHvYf-_WFQ_DzGGY9_gIuUW4RwD5UBAYaAogJkFNxzOywAYFFUzL8_-s9CW5KmULwFAhLgh8BVfiECrrfSgluriLw_hY2crnVAotwQ8pVz7te5tjSYdrctHZXQk3f74kny_PH6tXunlfv62eNtSjkgNVApV23lorBBOONw3XPrSdxmCDbVsfmOcSHQrGnfLIdQvSsZpbBMW7rl6Su3m3z-n7GMpgtumYD9NJwwAbkILDVMK59PtsDp3pc9zbPBoEc-JiZi5m4mJOXMxY_wD9rlWs</recordid><startdate>20060501</startdate><enddate>20060501</enddate><creator>Loiacono, Eleanor T.</creator><creator>McCoy, Scott</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060501</creationdate><title>Website accessibility: a cross-sector comparison</title><author>Loiacono, Eleanor T. ; McCoy, Scott</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c187t-85189bcaaa5525b46649cedf91eaeaddce2c471b1524b8c149d07b234a1084ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Disabilities</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Handicapped accessibility</topic><topic>Internet access</topic><topic>Nonprofit organizations</topic><topic>Websites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loiacono, Eleanor T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCoy, Scott</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Universal access in the information society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loiacono, Eleanor T.</au><au>McCoy, Scott</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Website accessibility: a cross-sector comparison</atitle><jtitle>Universal access in the information society</jtitle><date>2006-05-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>393</spage><epage>399</epage><pages>393-399</pages><issn>1615-5289</issn><eissn>1615-5297</eissn><abstract>The Web has transformed the way organizations interact with clients, customers, and constituents. A large portion of these groups is often neglected, namely people with disabilities. This study compares federal government, non-profit organization (NPO), and corporate homepages accessibility to determine how accessible these websites are to people with disabilities and how they compare to each other. The results indicate that federal homepages (23%), which are mandated to be accessible, are significantly more accessible than NPO (11%) and corporate homepages (6%). [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/s10209-005-0003-y</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1615-5289 |
| ispartof | Universal access in the information society, 2006-05, Vol.4 (4), p.393-399 |
| issn | 1615-5289 1615-5297 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_201607540 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals |
| subjects | Comparative studies Disabilities Government agencies Handicapped accessibility Internet access Nonprofit organizations Websites |
| title | Website accessibility: a cross-sector comparison |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T15%3A32%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Website%20accessibility:%20a%20cross-sector%20comparison&rft.jtitle=Universal%20access%20in%20the%20information%20society&rft.au=Loiacono,%20Eleanor%20T.&rft.date=2006-05-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=393&rft.epage=399&rft.pages=393-399&rft.issn=1615-5289&rft.eissn=1615-5297&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10209-005-0003-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1021855591%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=201607540&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |