ALTERED RIGHT VENTRICULAR CONTRACTILE PATTERN AFTER CARDIAC SURGERY: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY
There were no significant differences in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), RV fractional area change (RV FAC) and RV size compared to postoperative values (LVEF 53.2 ± 0.9 vs 53.4 ± 10.9 % (p = 0.93), RV FAC 40 ± 6 vs 36 ± 7 % (p = 0.06), and RV size 3.7 ± 0.7 vs 4.0 ± 0.7 cm; p = 0.08). Co...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2018-03, Vol.71 (11), p.A1613-A1613 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | There were no significant differences in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), RV fractional area change (RV FAC) and RV size compared to postoperative values (LVEF 53.2 ± 0.9 vs 53.4 ± 10.9 % (p = 0.93), RV FAC 40 ± 6 vs 36 ± 7 % (p = 0.06), and RV size 3.7 ± 0.7 vs 4.0 ± 0.7 cm; p = 0.08). Conclusion After cardiac surgery, RV contractile pattern changed with diminished longitudinal shortening despite preserved RV FAC. [...]RV FAC or 3D echocardiogram is a preferable method for assessing RV function after cardiac surgery. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0735-1097 1558-3597 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0735-1097(18)32154-5 |