Coupling End‐Member Mixing Analysis and Isotope Mass Balancing (222‐Rn) for Differentiation of Fresh and Recirculated Submarine Groundwater Discharge Into Knysna Estuary, South Africa

Quantification of submarine groundwater discharge (SGD) is essential for evaluating the vulnerability of coastal water bodies to groundwater pollution and for understanding water body material cycles response due to potential discharge of nutrients, organic compounds, or heavy metals. Here we presen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Oceans 2018-02, Vol.123 (2), p.952-970
Hauptverfasser: Petermann, E., Knöller, K., Rocha, C., Scholten, J., Stollberg, R., Weiß, H., Schubert, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Quantification of submarine groundwater discharge (SGD) is essential for evaluating the vulnerability of coastal water bodies to groundwater pollution and for understanding water body material cycles response due to potential discharge of nutrients, organic compounds, or heavy metals. Here we present an environmental tracer‐based methodology for quantifying SGD into Knysna Estuary, South Africa. Both components of SGD, (1) fresh, terrestrial (FSGD) and (2) saline, recirculated (RSGD), were differentiated. We conducted an end‐member mixing analysis for radon (222Rn) and salinity time series of estuary water over two tidal cycles to determine fractions of seawater, riverwater, FSGD, and RSGD. The mixing analysis was treated as a constrained optimization problem for finding the end‐member mixing ratio that is producing the best fit to observations at every time step. Results revealed highest FSGD and RSGD fractions in the estuary during peak low tide. Over a 24 h time series, the portions of FSGD and RSGD in the estuary water were 0.2% and 0.8% near the estuary mouth and the FSGD/RSGD ratio was 1:3.3. We determined a median FSGD of 41,000 m³ d−1 (1.4 m³ d−1 per m shoreline) and a median RSGD of 135,000 m³ d−1 (4.5 m³ d−1 per m shoreline) which suggests that SGD exceeds river discharge by a factor of 1.0–2.1. By comparison to other sources, this implies that SGD is responsible for 28–73% of total DIN fluxes into Knysna Estuary. Key Points End‐member mixing analysis reveals SGD dynamics on a tidal time scale Combination with radon mass balance allows differentiation of fresh and recirculated SGD Fresh SGD/recirculated SGD ratio was 1:3.3; total SGD was a factor of 1.0–2.1 greater than river discharge
ISSN:2169-9275
2169-9291
DOI:10.1002/2017JC013008