Precision Livestock Farming and Farmers’ Duties to Livestock
Precision livestock farming (PLF) promises to allow modern, large-scale farms to replicate, at scale, caring farmers who know their animals. PLF refers to a suite of technologies, some only speculative. The goal is to use networked devices to continuously monitor individual animals on large farms, t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of agricultural & environmental ethics 2018-04, Vol.31 (2), p.181-195 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 195 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 181 |
container_title | Journal of agricultural & environmental ethics |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Werkheiser, Ian |
description | Precision livestock farming (PLF) promises to allow modern, large-scale farms to replicate, at scale, caring farmers who know their animals. PLF refers to a suite of technologies, some only speculative. The goal is to use networked devices to continuously monitor individual animals on large farms, to compare this information to expected norms, and to use algorithms to manage individual animals (e.g. via changes in climate, feeding, or reproductive decisions) automatically. Supporters say this could not only create an artificial version of the partially mythologized image of the good steward caring for his or her animals, but to also improve on it. As one paper in favor of PLF has said, “We can not only replace the farmer’s ‘eyes and ears’ to each individual animal as in the past, but several other variables (infections, physiological variables, stress, etc.) will soon be measurable in practice” (Berckmans, in: Geers, Madec (eds) Livestock production and society, Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, pp 287–292,
2006
). Yet these methods of monitoring and control raise a host of ethical issues, including alienation of laborers, further consolidation of farms, and further cover for meat consumption (a possibly independent ethical problem depending on one’s views of eating meat). In this paper, I will address these ethical issues, and suggest a different, under-examined concern: namely, that though PLF may indeed improve the lives of livestock, and the sustainability of livestock operations, it is possible that it will do so at the cost of a loss of identity and relationships for farmers, as well as for the animals in their charge. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10806-018-9720-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2002589884</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2002589884</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-ccfa036af3bd1d9172a37eebce3f09389d0318f4c9c506b29f80a6f50e7a98e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFKAzEURYMoWKsf4G7AdfS9pDNJNoJUq8KALhTchTSTlKl2piYzgrv-hr_nl5g6Qleu3l2cex8cQk4RzhFAXEQECQUFlFQJBhT2yAhzwSln7GU_ZZSCClnwQ3IU4xIAlMTJiFw-BmfrWLdNVtYfLnatfc1mJqzqZpGZpvrNLsTvzVd23Xe1i1nX7tBjcuDNW3Qnf3dMnmc3T9M7Wj7c3k-vSmo5Fh211hvghfF8XmGlUDDDhXNz67gHxaWqgKP0E6tsDsWcKS_BFD4HJ4ySjvMxORt216F979NvvWz70KSXmgGwXCopJ4nCgbKhjTE4r9ehXpnwqRH0VpMeNOmkSW81aUgdNnRiYpuFC7vl_0s_Ff5rCg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2002589884</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Precision Livestock Farming and Farmers’ Duties to Livestock</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Werkheiser, Ian</creator><creatorcontrib>Werkheiser, Ian</creatorcontrib><description>Precision livestock farming (PLF) promises to allow modern, large-scale farms to replicate, at scale, caring farmers who know their animals. PLF refers to a suite of technologies, some only speculative. The goal is to use networked devices to continuously monitor individual animals on large farms, to compare this information to expected norms, and to use algorithms to manage individual animals (e.g. via changes in climate, feeding, or reproductive decisions) automatically. Supporters say this could not only create an artificial version of the partially mythologized image of the good steward caring for his or her animals, but to also improve on it. As one paper in favor of PLF has said, “We can not only replace the farmer’s ‘eyes and ears’ to each individual animal as in the past, but several other variables (infections, physiological variables, stress, etc.) will soon be measurable in practice” (Berckmans, in: Geers, Madec (eds) Livestock production and society, Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, pp 287–292,
2006
). Yet these methods of monitoring and control raise a host of ethical issues, including alienation of laborers, further consolidation of farms, and further cover for meat consumption (a possibly independent ethical problem depending on one’s views of eating meat). In this paper, I will address these ethical issues, and suggest a different, under-examined concern: namely, that though PLF may indeed improve the lives of livestock, and the sustainability of livestock operations, it is possible that it will do so at the cost of a loss of identity and relationships for farmers, as well as for the animals in their charge.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1187-7863</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-322X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10806-018-9720-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Agricultural Economics ; Agriculture ; Algorithms ; Animal care ; Animals ; Bioethics ; Climate change ; Consolidation ; Control methods ; Education ; Electronic devices ; Environmental ethics ; Ethical standards ; Ethics ; Evolutionary Biology ; Factory farming ; Farmers ; Farming ; Farms ; Livestock ; Livestock farming ; Livestock industry ; Livestock production ; Meat ; Meat industry ; Monitoring methods ; Norms ; Philosophy ; Plant Sciences ; Precision farming ; Sustainability ; Sustainable agriculture ; Theory of Medicine/Bioethics</subject><ispartof>Journal of agricultural & environmental ethics, 2018-04, Vol.31 (2), p.181-195</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-ccfa036af3bd1d9172a37eebce3f09389d0318f4c9c506b29f80a6f50e7a98e33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-ccfa036af3bd1d9172a37eebce3f09389d0318f4c9c506b29f80a6f50e7a98e33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10806-018-9720-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10806-018-9720-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Werkheiser, Ian</creatorcontrib><title>Precision Livestock Farming and Farmers’ Duties to Livestock</title><title>Journal of agricultural & environmental ethics</title><addtitle>J Agric Environ Ethics</addtitle><description>Precision livestock farming (PLF) promises to allow modern, large-scale farms to replicate, at scale, caring farmers who know their animals. PLF refers to a suite of technologies, some only speculative. The goal is to use networked devices to continuously monitor individual animals on large farms, to compare this information to expected norms, and to use algorithms to manage individual animals (e.g. via changes in climate, feeding, or reproductive decisions) automatically. Supporters say this could not only create an artificial version of the partially mythologized image of the good steward caring for his or her animals, but to also improve on it. As one paper in favor of PLF has said, “We can not only replace the farmer’s ‘eyes and ears’ to each individual animal as in the past, but several other variables (infections, physiological variables, stress, etc.) will soon be measurable in practice” (Berckmans, in: Geers, Madec (eds) Livestock production and society, Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, pp 287–292,
2006
). Yet these methods of monitoring and control raise a host of ethical issues, including alienation of laborers, further consolidation of farms, and further cover for meat consumption (a possibly independent ethical problem depending on one’s views of eating meat). In this paper, I will address these ethical issues, and suggest a different, under-examined concern: namely, that though PLF may indeed improve the lives of livestock, and the sustainability of livestock operations, it is possible that it will do so at the cost of a loss of identity and relationships for farmers, as well as for the animals in their charge.</description><subject>Agricultural Economics</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Animal care</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Consolidation</subject><subject>Control methods</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Electronic devices</subject><subject>Environmental ethics</subject><subject>Ethical standards</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Evolutionary Biology</subject><subject>Factory farming</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Farming</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Livestock farming</subject><subject>Livestock industry</subject><subject>Livestock production</subject><subject>Meat</subject><subject>Meat industry</subject><subject>Monitoring methods</subject><subject>Norms</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Precision farming</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable agriculture</subject><subject>Theory of Medicine/Bioethics</subject><issn>1187-7863</issn><issn>1573-322X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>88H</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2N</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMFKAzEURYMoWKsf4G7AdfS9pDNJNoJUq8KALhTchTSTlKl2piYzgrv-hr_nl5g6Qleu3l2cex8cQk4RzhFAXEQECQUFlFQJBhT2yAhzwSln7GU_ZZSCClnwQ3IU4xIAlMTJiFw-BmfrWLdNVtYfLnatfc1mJqzqZpGZpvrNLsTvzVd23Xe1i1nX7tBjcuDNW3Qnf3dMnmc3T9M7Wj7c3k-vSmo5Fh211hvghfF8XmGlUDDDhXNz67gHxaWqgKP0E6tsDsWcKS_BFD4HJ4ySjvMxORt216F979NvvWz70KSXmgGwXCopJ4nCgbKhjTE4r9ehXpnwqRH0VpMeNOmkSW81aUgdNnRiYpuFC7vl_0s_Ff5rCg</recordid><startdate>20180401</startdate><enddate>20180401</enddate><creator>Werkheiser, Ian</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88H</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180401</creationdate><title>Precision Livestock Farming and Farmers’ Duties to Livestock</title><author>Werkheiser, Ian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-ccfa036af3bd1d9172a37eebce3f09389d0318f4c9c506b29f80a6f50e7a98e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Agricultural Economics</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Animal care</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Consolidation</topic><topic>Control methods</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Electronic devices</topic><topic>Environmental ethics</topic><topic>Ethical standards</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Evolutionary Biology</topic><topic>Factory farming</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Farming</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Livestock farming</topic><topic>Livestock industry</topic><topic>Livestock production</topic><topic>Meat</topic><topic>Meat industry</topic><topic>Monitoring methods</topic><topic>Norms</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Precision farming</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable agriculture</topic><topic>Theory of Medicine/Bioethics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Werkheiser, Ian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Religion Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Access via Art, Design & Architecture Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Religion Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>CBCA Reference & Current Events</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of agricultural & environmental ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Werkheiser, Ian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Precision Livestock Farming and Farmers’ Duties to Livestock</atitle><jtitle>Journal of agricultural & environmental ethics</jtitle><stitle>J Agric Environ Ethics</stitle><date>2018-04-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>181</spage><epage>195</epage><pages>181-195</pages><issn>1187-7863</issn><eissn>1573-322X</eissn><abstract>Precision livestock farming (PLF) promises to allow modern, large-scale farms to replicate, at scale, caring farmers who know their animals. PLF refers to a suite of technologies, some only speculative. The goal is to use networked devices to continuously monitor individual animals on large farms, to compare this information to expected norms, and to use algorithms to manage individual animals (e.g. via changes in climate, feeding, or reproductive decisions) automatically. Supporters say this could not only create an artificial version of the partially mythologized image of the good steward caring for his or her animals, but to also improve on it. As one paper in favor of PLF has said, “We can not only replace the farmer’s ‘eyes and ears’ to each individual animal as in the past, but several other variables (infections, physiological variables, stress, etc.) will soon be measurable in practice” (Berckmans, in: Geers, Madec (eds) Livestock production and society, Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, pp 287–292,
2006
). Yet these methods of monitoring and control raise a host of ethical issues, including alienation of laborers, further consolidation of farms, and further cover for meat consumption (a possibly independent ethical problem depending on one’s views of eating meat). In this paper, I will address these ethical issues, and suggest a different, under-examined concern: namely, that though PLF may indeed improve the lives of livestock, and the sustainability of livestock operations, it is possible that it will do so at the cost of a loss of identity and relationships for farmers, as well as for the animals in their charge.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10806-018-9720-0</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1187-7863 |
ispartof | Journal of agricultural & environmental ethics, 2018-04, Vol.31 (2), p.181-195 |
issn | 1187-7863 1573-322X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2002589884 |
source | SpringerNature Journals; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Agricultural Economics Agriculture Algorithms Animal care Animals Bioethics Climate change Consolidation Control methods Education Electronic devices Environmental ethics Ethical standards Ethics Evolutionary Biology Factory farming Farmers Farming Farms Livestock Livestock farming Livestock industry Livestock production Meat Meat industry Monitoring methods Norms Philosophy Plant Sciences Precision farming Sustainability Sustainable agriculture Theory of Medicine/Bioethics |
title | Precision Livestock Farming and Farmers’ Duties to Livestock |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T00%3A37%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Precision%20Livestock%20Farming%20and%20Farmers%E2%80%99%20Duties%20to%20Livestock&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20agricultural%20&%20environmental%20ethics&rft.au=Werkheiser,%20Ian&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=181&rft.epage=195&rft.pages=181-195&rft.issn=1187-7863&rft.eissn=1573-322X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10806-018-9720-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2002589884%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2002589884&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |