Characterization of forced degradation products of canagliflozine by liquid chromatography/quadrupole time‐of‐flight tandem mass spectrometry and in silico toxicity predictions
Rationale Forced degradation studies are useful for better understanding of the stability of active pharmaceutical ingredients and drugs and to generate information about drug degradation pathways and formation of degradation products (DPs). Identification of DPs plays a vital role in establishing t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Rapid communications in mass spectrometry 2018-02, Vol.32 (3), p.212-220 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Rationale
Forced degradation studies are useful for better understanding of the stability of active pharmaceutical ingredients and drugs and to generate information about drug degradation pathways and formation of degradation products (DPs). Identification of DPs plays a vital role in establishing the safety and therapeutic benefit of a drug.
Methods
Canagliflozin (CAN) was subjected to different stress conditions as per International Conference on Harmonization guidelines (Q1A R2). All the DPs and the drug were well separated on an Aquity CSH C18 (100 × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm) column using acetonitrile–methanol (70:30, v/v) and formic acid in gradient mode. The same UPLC method was employed for LC/HRMS for the characterization of DPs. In addition, in silico toxicity was predicted for all the DPs by using TOPKAT and DEREK software tools.
Results
CAN was found to degrade under oxidative stress condition and formed DP1 and DP2. This is a typical case of degradation where co‐solvents acetonitrile–water (50:50, v/v) and methanol–water (50:50, v/v) react with CAN under acid hydrolytic conditions leading to the formation of pseudo‐DPs, DP3 and DP4, respectively. Among these, DP2 and DP3 showed ocular irritancy whereas DP1 showed skin sensitization.
Conclusions
The drug was labile under oxidative stress condition. CAN reacted with co‐solvent under acid hydrolytic conditions and gave pseudo‐DPs. All the DPs were separated using UPLC and characterized by LC/QTOF/MS/MS. Toxicity of DPs was evaluated using TOPKAT and DEREK software tools. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0951-4198 1097-0231 |
DOI: | 10.1002/rcm.8032 |