SO2 as a possible proxy for volcanic ash in aviation hazard avoidance

Airborne volcanic ash poses a significant danger to aircraft, but is difficult to quantify accurately using satellite data, while sulphur dioxide is much easier to detect accurately, but is much less of a direct hazard to aviation. This paper investigates the reliability of using SO2 as a proxy for...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres 2013-06, Vol.118 (11), p.5698-5709
Hauptverfasser: Sears, T. M., Thomas, G. E., Carboni, E., A. Smith, A. J., Grainger, R. G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Airborne volcanic ash poses a significant danger to aircraft, but is difficult to quantify accurately using satellite data, while sulphur dioxide is much easier to detect accurately, but is much less of a direct hazard to aviation. This paper investigates the reliability of using SO2 as a proxy for the location of volcanic ash, using an SO2 retrieval from the Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) and ash detections from IASI and the Advanced Along Track Scanning Radiometer (AATSR). Using a numerical “missed ash fraction” applied to the eruptions of Eyjafjallajökull in 2010 and Puyehue‐Cordón Caulle in 2011 reveals that the SO2 flag typically misses ∼30% of the detectable ash. Furthermore, the missed ash fraction is found to be highly variable, both between the two eruptions and over the course of each eruption, with values of over 80% found on some days. The detection threshold of the AATSR ash flag is also investigated using radiative transfer calculations, allowing the threshold of the IASI flag to be inferred, and these are related to the ash contamination levels. Key Points SO2 cannot be used as a proxy for the location of volcanic ash plumes For aviation safety satellite detection of ash is not sufficient on its own A quantitative comparison of ash and SO2 collocation has been carried out
ISSN:2169-897X
2169-8996
DOI:10.1002/jgrd.50505