SERS Detection of Insecticide Amitraz Residue in Milk Based on Au@Ag Core-Shell Nanoparticles
A simple, rapid, and environmentally friendly surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) method was developed for the determination of trace amitraz in milk with the use of silver-coated gold nanoparticles (Au@Ag NPs) as enhancing reagent. The normal Raman and SERS spectra of amitraz were analyzed, an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Food analytical methods 2018, Vol.11 (1), p.69-76 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A simple, rapid, and environmentally friendly surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) method was developed for the determination of trace amitraz in milk with the use of silver-coated gold nanoparticles (Au@Ag NPs) as enhancing reagent. The normal Raman and SERS spectra of amitraz were analyzed, and the peaks were assigned by density functional theory. The morphology of Au@Ag NPs was characterized and confirmed by transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy. The SERS effects of Au@Ag NPs were investigated, including the types of solvents for dissolving amitraz, the volume ratio of the Au@Ag NPs and amitraz, and the concentration of aggregating agent (NaCl) for aggregate Au@Ag NPs. Results show that ethanol exerts the least interference on the SERS spectrum of amitraz and is more environmentally sound than methanol. The strongest SERS signal appeared when the volume ratio of Au@Ag NPs and amitraz was 2:1. Moreover, the strongest SERS signals appeared when the concentration of NaCl was 0.025 mol L
−1
because of appropriate aggregation. Under the optimum conditions, the concentration of amitraz presents a good linear relationship with Raman intensity (723 cm
−1
) with a linear range of 9.77 × 10
−4
~2.93 × 10
−2
g L
−1
. The detected recoveries of amitraz in milk were between 81.7 and 100.5% with a relative standard deviation (RSD) of 2.61~5.51%. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1936-9751 1936-976X |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12161-017-0966-3 |