Multicentre evaluation of ryanodine contracture testing in malignant hyperthermia

A common protocol for in vitro contracture testing using the plant alkaloid ryanodine has been used by the European Malignant Hyperthermia Group since 1993. This protocol describes a test using I mumol/litre of high purity ryanodine (98%) added as a single bolus dose. The main aim of this study was to compare the results obtained with this test between laboratories with a view to assessing the validity of adopting common diagnostic end-points for use in future collaborative studies. In order to do this it was first necessary to determine the optimum cut-off values of the end-points for discriminating between patients diagnosed as susceptible or not to malignant hyperthermia. The end-points under evaluation were expressed in terms of time after application of ryanodine at which a certain degree of contracture develops. In this study, four end-points were investigated: time to initial contracture development (Ot); time to development of a 10-mN contracture (10t); time from addition of ryanodine to when baseline tension exceeds pre-drug tension (0tp); and time for contracture to reach 10 mN above pre-drug baseline tension (10tp). This protocol was developed initially and used by three investigating centres and the initial assessment of the end-points and their discriminatory ability was made using the first 100 patients from each of centres 1 and 2, and the first 90 patients from centre No. 3. Optimal cut-off values for each of the end-points were determined using logistic regression analysis. Discriminatory ability was improved by combining the Ot and 10t end-points (P < 0.05) but not significantly by combining the 0tp and 10tp end-points. Both methods of categorization were highly sensitive and specific compared with the current standard diagnostic tests. Results from eight additional diagnostic centres which have used the ryanodine contracture test more recently, while indicating that susceptible and normal individuals can be distinguished within a single laboratory, produced a level of variability between testing centres for the ryanodine contracture test that is incompatible with the use of common cut-off values. Possible causes for this variability between laboratories are discussed.