Urinary bladder scanning after day-case arthroscopy under spinal anaesthesia: comparison between lidocaine, ropivacaine, and levobupivacaine

Micturition problems after spinal anaesthesia may delay hospital discharge. The use of lidocaine has raised concerns because of the occurrence of transient neurological symptoms (TNS). This randomized double-blind study was designed to compare the newer local anaesthetics with lidocaine regarding bl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of anaesthesia : BJA 2003-03, Vol.90 (3), p.309-313
Hauptverfasser: Breebaart, M. B., Vercauteren, M. P., Hoffmann, V. L., Adriaensen, H. A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Micturition problems after spinal anaesthesia may delay hospital discharge. The use of lidocaine has raised concerns because of the occurrence of transient neurological symptoms (TNS). This randomized double-blind study was designed to compare the newer local anaesthetics with lidocaine regarding block characteristics, micturition problems, and discharge times in day-case spinals for arthroscopy. Ninety patients received either isobaric lidocaine 60 mg, ropivacaine 15 mg, or levobupivacaine 10 mg intrathecally. Urinary bladder volumes were measured by ultrasound imaging at regular time intervals until a post-voiding residual volume (PVRV) less than 100 ml was obtained. Micturition problems were classified in five groups ranging from no problems to those requiring catheterization. Times to regain a Bromage-1 and -0 motor block were similar in the three groups but sensory block regression to L2 occurred at 145 (30) min in the lidocaine group, 25–30 min (P
ISSN:0007-0912
1471-6771
DOI:10.1093/bja/aeg078