Judicial Laterals
Within this hierarchical structure that transcends judicial systems-what we might call "transsystemic hierarchy"-higher positions in the hierarchy are thought to be more prestigious than are lower positions. [...]the judicial labor market is not nationwide; instead it is largely limited to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Vanderbilt law review 2017-11, Vol.70 (6), p.1911-1933 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Within this hierarchical structure that transcends judicial systems-what we might call "transsystemic hierarchy"-higher positions in the hierarchy are thought to be more prestigious than are lower positions. [...]the judicial labor market is not nationwide; instead it is largely limited to the state in which the judge currently sits. [...]appellate judges are generally paid more than trial judges, with high court judges generally paid more than intermediate appellate court judges. [...]one might expect that salary is especially important to a judge's decision to make a lateral move.32 In particular, one might think that a judge would be reluctant to accept salary reductions in connection with a concomitant reduction in either the judge's level in the transsystemic judicial hierarchy-i.e., if the judge receives a stepdown-or the judge's judicial system on the intersystemic judicial hierarchy-i.e., if the judge moves from the federal judiciary to a state judicial system. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0042-2533 1942-9886 |