Judicial Laterals

Within this hierarchical structure that transcends judicial systems-what we might call "transsystemic hierarchy"-higher positions in the hierarchy are thought to be more prestigious than are lower positions. [...]the judicial labor market is not nationwide; instead it is largely limited to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Vanderbilt law review 2017-11, Vol.70 (6), p.1911-1933
1. Verfasser: Nash, Jonathan Remy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Within this hierarchical structure that transcends judicial systems-what we might call "transsystemic hierarchy"-higher positions in the hierarchy are thought to be more prestigious than are lower positions. [...]the judicial labor market is not nationwide; instead it is largely limited to the state in which the judge currently sits. [...]appellate judges are generally paid more than trial judges, with high court judges generally paid more than intermediate appellate court judges. [...]one might expect that salary is especially important to a judge's decision to make a lateral move.32 In particular, one might think that a judge would be reluctant to accept salary reductions in connection with a concomitant reduction in either the judge's level in the transsystemic judicial hierarchy-i.e., if the judge receives a stepdown-or the judge's judicial system on the intersystemic judicial hierarchy-i.e., if the judge moves from the federal judiciary to a state judicial system.
ISSN:0042-2533
1942-9886