The Doing of Philosophy in the Music Class: Some Practical Considerations. Response to Bennett Reimer
A reply to Bennett Reimer's "The Doing of Philosophy in the Music Class: Some Practical Considerations" is presented. How the author of this article responds to Reimer's challenge depends in part on how they define philosophy in this context. Their thinking about music occurs in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Philosophy of music education review 2005-10, Vol.13 (2), p.142-145 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A reply to Bennett Reimer's "The Doing of Philosophy in the Music Class: Some Practical Considerations" is presented. How the author of this article responds to Reimer's challenge depends in part on how they define philosophy in this context. Their thinking about music occurs in at least two different ways. She suggests that music possesses both instrumental and intrinsic value with respect to philosophical analysis, as well as instances where the two values are combined. In pondering these values they bring together several so-called philosophical "methodologies": the search for meaning or understanding, analysis, criticism, and synthesis. In the process they build arguments that are consistent, coherent, and correspond with the musical evidence. It is also important to articulate several assumptions if they aspire to "doing" philosophy within the teaching of music. These include a belief that it is worthwhile to develop such thinking skills as the author has outlined; that they are willing to take the time for dialogue within the music class or rehearsal hour; and that they as teachers are willing to be facilitators of questions rather than experts with answers. (Contains 4 notes.) |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1063-5734 1543-3412 |
DOI: | 10.2979/PME.2005.13.2.142 |