Early Referral of School-Age Children with Language Problems

This study investigated the effectiveness of using an observational checklist to facilitate early teacher referral of children suspected of having language problems. Twelve classroom teachers completed the Observational Checklist of Conversational Skills on 37 kindergarten and first grade students w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Communication disorders quarterly 1995-05, Vol.16 (2), p.3-9
Hauptverfasser: Sanger, Dixie D., Aspedon, Mary, Hux, Karen, Chapman, Angela
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study investigated the effectiveness of using an observational checklist to facilitate early teacher referral of children suspected of having language problems. Twelve classroom teachers completed the Observational Checklist of Conversational Skills on 37 kindergarten and first grade students whom they suspected had language problems (i.e., were at-risk for language impairments) and 37 age-matched peers. Students in the at-risk group were evaluated using the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals-Revised (CELF-R) and the Communication Abilities Diagnostic Test (CADeT). Scores revealed that 25 of the 37 subjects (67.57%) were at least 1.5 standard deviations below the mean and 14 of the 37 (37.84%) were at least 2.0 standard deviations below the mean on one or both of the measures. Follow-up data collected one year later on 36 of the 37 at-risk students revealed that 27 (75%) had been referred for special education evaluation. Fourteen of those referred were verified as language impaired and/or learning disabled and one subject was verified as other health impaired (ADHD); six subjects did not qualify for services and, for the remaining six, the evaluation process was not yet complete. Of the 37 age-matched peers, two (5.41 %) had been referred for evaluation; one did not qualify for services and the other was verified as articulation impaired. Implications for using checklists to facilitate early teacher referral are discussed.
ISSN:1525-7401
0735-3170
1538-4837
DOI:10.1177/152574019501600201