The importance of KRAS mutations and EGF61A>G polymorphism to the effect of cetuximab and irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer

The effect of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies (mAb) in metastatic colorectal cancer seems limited to KRAS wild-type (wt) tumours, but still a major fraction of KRASwt patients are nonresponders and supplementary selection criteria are needed. We investigated methodological as...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of oncology 2009-05, Vol.20 (5), p.879-884
Hauptverfasser: Garm Spindler, K. -L., Pallisgaard, N., Rasmussen, A.A., Lindebjerg, J., Andersen, R.F., Crüger, D., Jakobsen, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The effect of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies (mAb) in metastatic colorectal cancer seems limited to KRAS wild-type (wt) tumours, but still a major fraction of KRASwt patients are nonresponders and supplementary selection criteria are needed. We investigated methodological aspects of KRAS testing and the predictive and prognostic value of KRAS status combined with three EGFR-related gene polymorphisms [single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)] in patients treated with cetuximab and irinotecan. The study included 71 patients referred to third-line cetuximab–irinotecan. Blood samples were analysed for SNPs. KRAS analysis was carried out by sequencing analysis and quantitative PCR (DxS kit) in primary tumour and distant metastases. There was a clear correlation between KRAS status in primary tumours and metastasis. The DxS kit presented the highest sensitivity. Response was confined to KRASwt patients (40% response rate versus 0%, P < 0.1-3), which translated into a significant difference in PFS. The EGF61A>G polymorphism showed relation to clinical outcome. A combined biomarker analysis showed a 19% progression rate in KRASwt-EGF61 homozygote patients and 60% in the EGF61A/G patients (P = 0.006) and a significant increase in overall survival (17.1 versus 5.9 months, log-rank, P = 0.002). The combined biomarker analysis maybe an attractive approach to selection of patients for third-line treatment including anti-EGFR mAbs.
ISSN:0923-7534
1569-8041
DOI:10.1093/annonc/mdn712