Geochemistry of О, Н, C, S, and Sr isotopes in the water and sediments of the Aral basin

The paper presents original authors' data on the O, H, C, S, and Sr isotopic composition of water and sediments from the basins into which the Aral Sea split after its catastrophic shoaling: Chernyshev Bay (CB), the basin of the Great Aral in the north, Lake Tshchebas (LT), and Minor Sea (MS)....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geochemistry international 2017-11, Vol.55 (11), p.1033-1045
Hauptverfasser: Pokrovsky, B. G., Zaviyalov, P. O., Bujakaite, M. I., Izhitskiy, A. S., Petrov, O. L., Kurbaniyazov, A. K., Shimanovich, V. M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The paper presents original authors' data on the O, H, C, S, and Sr isotopic composition of water and sediments from the basins into which the Aral Sea split after its catastrophic shoaling: Chernyshev Bay (CB), the basin of the Great Aral in the north, Lake Tshchebas (LT), and Minor Sea (MS). The data indicate that the δ 18 О, δD, δ 13 C, and δ 34 S of the water correlate with the mineralization ( S ) of the basins (as of 2014): for CB, S = 135.6‰, δ 18 О = 4.8 ± 0.1‰, δD = 5 ± 2‰, δ 13 C (dissolved inorganic carbon, DIC) = 3.5 ± 0.1‰, δ 34 S = 14.5‰; for LT, S = 83.8‰, δ 18 О = 2.0 ± 0.1‰, δD =–13.5 ± 1.5‰, δ 13 C = 2.0 ± 0.1‰, δ 34 S = 14.2‰; and for MS, S = 9.2‰, δ 18 О =–2.0 ± 0.1‰, δD =–29 ± 1‰, δ 13 C =–0.5 ± 0.5‰, δ 34 S = 13.1‰. The oxygen and hydrogen isotopic composition of the groundwaters are similar to those in MS and principally different from the artesian waters fed by atmospheric precipitation. The mineralization, δ 13 С, and δ 34 S of the groundwaters broadly vary, reflecting interaction with the host rocks. The average δ 13 С values of the shell and detrital carbonates sampled at the modern dried off zones of the basins are similar: 0.8 ± 0.8‰ for CB, 0.8 ± 1.4‰ for LT, and –0.4 ± 0.3‰ for MS. The oxygen isotopic composition of the carbonates varies much more broadly, and the average values are as follows: 34.2 ± 0.2‰ for CB, 32.0 ± 2.2‰ for LT, and 28.2 ± 0.9‰ for MS. These values correlate with the δ 18 O of the water of the corresponding basins. The carbonate cement of the Late Eocene sandstone of the Chengan Formation, which makes up the wave-cut terrace at CB, has anomalously low δ 13 С up to –38.5‰, suggesting origin near a submarine methane seep. The δ 34 S of the mirabilite and gypsum (11.0 to 16.6‰) from the bottom sediments and young dried off zone also decrease from CB to MS in response to increasing content of sulfates brought by the Syr-Darya River (δ 34 S = 9.1 to 9.9‰) and weakening sulfate reduction. The 87 Sr/ 86 Sr ratio in the water and carbonates of the Aral basins do not differ, within the analytical error, and is 0.70914 ± 0.00003 on average. This value indicate that the dominant Sr source of the Aral Sea is Mesozoic–Cenozoic carbonate rocks. The Rb–Sr systems of the silicate component of the bottom silt (which is likely dominated by eolian sediments) of MS and LT plot on the Т = 160 ± 5 Ma, I 0 = 0.7091 ± 0.0001, pseudochron. The Rb–Sr systems of CB are less ordered, and the silt is likely a mixture of eolian and a
ISSN:0016-7029
1556-1968
DOI:10.1134/S0016702917110076