Opening Up Vision: The Case Against Encapsulation
Many have argued that early visual processing is encapsulated from the influence of higher-level goals, expectations, and knowledge of the world. (Early vision is thought to result in perception of three-dimensional shapes and surfaces, prior to object recognition and categorization.) Here we confro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Review of philosophy and psychology 2016-12, Vol.7 (4), p.721-742 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Many have argued that early visual processing is encapsulated from the influence of higher-level goals, expectations, and knowledge of the world. (Early vision is thought to result in perception of three-dimensional shapes and surfaces, prior to object recognition and categorization.) Here we confront the main arguments offered in support of such a view, showing that they are unpersuasive. We also present evidence of top–down influences on early vision, emphasizing data from cognitive neuroscience. Our conclusion is that encapsulation is not a defining feature of visual processing. But we take this conclusion to be quite modest in scope, readily incorporated into mainstream vision science. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1878-5158 1878-5166 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s13164-015-0294-8 |