Energy and exergy analysis of a ground source heat pump system for a public building in Wuhan, China under different control strategies

[Display omitted] •Dynamic energy and exergy analysis models were developed for a ground source heat pump system under TRNSYS environment.•Five control strategies were proposed for system performance improvements.•The exergy efficiency was improved from 7.7% to 9.2% with reduction on exergy loss by...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy and buildings 2017-10, Vol.152, p.301-312
Hauptverfasser: Hu, Pingfang, Hu, Qiushi, Lin, Yaolin, Yang, Wei, Xing, Lu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:[Display omitted] •Dynamic energy and exergy analysis models were developed for a ground source heat pump system under TRNSYS environment.•Five control strategies were proposed for system performance improvements.•The exergy efficiency was improved from 7.7% to 9.2% with reduction on exergy loss by 39.4%.•The system COP during heating season was improved from 3.2 to 3.7 with reduction on energy consumption by 37%.•The system COP during cooling season was improved from 2.7 to 3.8 with reduction on energy consumption by 60%. This paper presents the energy and exergy studies of a ground source heat pump (GSHP) system for a public building in Wuhan, China under five different control strategies to improve the system performance. Original system was under manual operation with constant frequency heat pump, constant speed circulation pumps, and constant water flow rate. The five control strategies were: 1) Automatic ON/OFF control based on Building Load Ratio (BLR); 2) Optimum circulation flow rate control; 3) Optimum ON/OFF control with variable speed heat pump units; 4) Variable flow control by adjusting valve position; 5) Variable flow control by variable speed pumps. The results of the system exergy efficiency, exergy loss, COP, and energy consumption under different operation scenarios are presented. By comparing original operation with the best case (scenario five), it is found that during cooling and heating season, the system exergy efficiency was improved from 9.0% to 10.4% and from 6.1% to 6.9%; exergy loss dropped by 31% and 51%; COP increased from 3.2 to 3.7 and from 2.7 to 3.8; and energy consumption was reduced by 37% and 60%, respectively.
ISSN:0378-7788
1872-6178
DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.07.058