Response to Murphy's "Re-Viewing Business Communication"
In our original article, "The Legitimacy of Business Communication," we used a model developed by Kenneth Boulding, an economist, to provide a foundation for viewing the discipline in which we teach as a stand-alone field within the academic arena. Our intent was to include the many facets...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of business communication (1973) 1998-01, Vol.35 (1), p.149-153 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In our original article, "The Legitimacy of Business Communication," we used
a model developed by Kenneth Boulding, an economist, to provide a foundation
for viewing the discipline in which we teach as a stand-alone field within the
academic arena. Our intent was to include the many facets of communicating in
the business environment under one all-encompassing discipline since executive
communication, management communication, organizational communication,
as well as presentation courses and many others, are all part of communicating
in business. If those of us teaching in our field view ourselves as members of a
specific discipline rather than a sub-area or stepchild of a larger academic field,
our peers are more likely to see us as a legitimate academic discipline. Accord
ing to Boulding, external and internal legitimacy are necessary for work to be
viewed as legitimate. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0021-9436 2329-4884 1552-4582 2329-4892 |
DOI: | 10.1177/002194369803500111 |