Responding to the Supreme Court: employment practices and the ADA

Recent decisions from the Supreme Court have narrowed the coverage of the Americans with Disabilities Act by restricting the definition of an ADA disability. By holding that mitigating measures must be considered in determining whether someone has a disability within the meaning of the ADA, the Cour...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Business horizons 2003, Vol.46 (1), p.30-36
Hauptverfasser: Zugelder, Michael T., Champagne, Paul J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Recent decisions from the Supreme Court have narrowed the coverage of the Americans with Disabilities Act by restricting the definition of an ADA disability. By holding that mitigating measures must be considered in determining whether someone has a disability within the meaning of the ADA, the Court avers that only those disabilities that continue to "substantially limit" a "major life activity," even with mitigation, will be covered by the Act. Still, the limitations set forth in the Supreme Court decisions, together with the aggressive posture of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, must be give due consideration before employers conclude that any individual applicant of employee falls outside of the ADA's protection.
ISSN:0007-6813
1873-6068
DOI:10.1016/S0007-6813(02)00277-X