Ethics for editors: an analytical decision-making process
Editors face ethical dilemmas when conflicts arise between their loyalties to readers, to authors, and to employers. They can systematically resolve such conflicts by applying an analytical decision-making process called "value analysis". This six-step process enables editors to take advan...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on professional communication 1998-03, Vol.41 (1), p.58-65 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 65 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 58 |
| container_title | IEEE transactions on professional communication |
| container_volume | 41 |
| creator | Allen, L. Voss, D. |
| description | Editors face ethical dilemmas when conflicts arise between their loyalties to readers, to authors, and to employers. They can systematically resolve such conflicts by applying an analytical decision-making process called "value analysis". This six-step process enables editors to take advantage of a model to rank core values and resolve the issue in favor of the more important value. An examination of codes of ethics of communication-related professional organizations identified ten core values to use in applying the model. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1109/47.661631 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_195299633</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>661631</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>328716</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-e2b5fef5eabea7a819da67e64783a1f6686e02054190404575b16d0e27c10b953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0TtLA0EQB_BFFIyPwtbqsBAsLu7cvu0kxAcEbLQ-9vbmdOPlLu5einx7N1ywsAkMTDE_ZmD-hFwBnQJQc8_VVEqQDI7IBITQOQhKj8mEMgk5cMZPyVmMS0qBp8GEmPnw5V3Mmj5kWPuhD_Ehs10q224H72yb1eh89H2Xr-y37z6zdegdxnhBThrbRrzc93Py8TR_n73ki7fn19njIneFhiHHohINNgJthVZZDaa2UqHkSjMLjZRaIi2o4GAop1woUYGsKRbKAa2MYOfkdtyb7v5sMA7lykeHbWs77DexLIxiihp9GGopCqb5QZj-BlIDS_DmH1z2m5A-k4wRhTGS7dDdiFzoYwzYlOvgVzZsS6DlLpOSq3LMJNnr0XpE_HP74S_2EYPs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195299633</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ethics for editors: an analytical decision-making process</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Allen, L. ; Voss, D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Allen, L. ; Voss, D.</creatorcontrib><description>Editors face ethical dilemmas when conflicts arise between their loyalties to readers, to authors, and to employers. They can systematically resolve such conflicts by applying an analytical decision-making process called "value analysis". This six-step process enables editors to take advantage of a model to rank core values and resolve the issue in favor of the more important value. An examination of codes of ethics of communication-related professional organizations identified ten core values to use in applying the model.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-1434</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-1500</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/47.661631</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IEPCBU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Business ethics ; Collaborative work ; Contracts ; Decision making ; Decision making models ; Editors ; Error correction ; Ethics ; File editors ; Human computer interaction ; Missiles ; Personnel ; Professional communication ; Protection ; Remuneration ; Scheduling ; Studies ; Value analysis</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on professional communication, 1998-03, Vol.41 (1), p.58-65</ispartof><rights>Copyright Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) Mar 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-e2b5fef5eabea7a819da67e64783a1f6686e02054190404575b16d0e27c10b953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-e2b5fef5eabea7a819da67e64783a1f6686e02054190404575b16d0e27c10b953</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/661631$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,792,27903,27904,54736</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/661631$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Allen, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voss, D.</creatorcontrib><title>Ethics for editors: an analytical decision-making process</title><title>IEEE transactions on professional communication</title><addtitle>TPC</addtitle><description>Editors face ethical dilemmas when conflicts arise between their loyalties to readers, to authors, and to employers. They can systematically resolve such conflicts by applying an analytical decision-making process called "value analysis". This six-step process enables editors to take advantage of a model to rank core values and resolve the issue in favor of the more important value. An examination of codes of ethics of communication-related professional organizations identified ten core values to use in applying the model.</description><subject>Business ethics</subject><subject>Collaborative work</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision making models</subject><subject>Editors</subject><subject>Error correction</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>File editors</subject><subject>Human computer interaction</subject><subject>Missiles</subject><subject>Personnel</subject><subject>Professional communication</subject><subject>Protection</subject><subject>Remuneration</subject><subject>Scheduling</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Value analysis</subject><issn>0361-1434</issn><issn>1558-1500</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0TtLA0EQB_BFFIyPwtbqsBAsLu7cvu0kxAcEbLQ-9vbmdOPlLu5einx7N1ywsAkMTDE_ZmD-hFwBnQJQc8_VVEqQDI7IBITQOQhKj8mEMgk5cMZPyVmMS0qBp8GEmPnw5V3Mmj5kWPuhD_Ehs10q224H72yb1eh89H2Xr-y37z6zdegdxnhBThrbRrzc93Py8TR_n73ki7fn19njIneFhiHHohINNgJthVZZDaa2UqHkSjMLjZRaIi2o4GAop1woUYGsKRbKAa2MYOfkdtyb7v5sMA7lykeHbWs77DexLIxiihp9GGopCqb5QZj-BlIDS_DmH1z2m5A-k4wRhTGS7dDdiFzoYwzYlOvgVzZsS6DlLpOSq3LMJNnr0XpE_HP74S_2EYPs</recordid><startdate>19980301</startdate><enddate>19980301</enddate><creator>Allen, L.</creator><creator>Voss, D.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980301</creationdate><title>Ethics for editors: an analytical decision-making process</title><author>Allen, L. ; Voss, D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-e2b5fef5eabea7a819da67e64783a1f6686e02054190404575b16d0e27c10b953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Business ethics</topic><topic>Collaborative work</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision making models</topic><topic>Editors</topic><topic>Error correction</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>File editors</topic><topic>Human computer interaction</topic><topic>Missiles</topic><topic>Personnel</topic><topic>Professional communication</topic><topic>Protection</topic><topic>Remuneration</topic><topic>Scheduling</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Value analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Allen, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voss, D.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on professional communication</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Allen, L.</au><au>Voss, D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ethics for editors: an analytical decision-making process</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on professional communication</jtitle><stitle>TPC</stitle><date>1998-03-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>58</spage><epage>65</epage><pages>58-65</pages><issn>0361-1434</issn><eissn>1558-1500</eissn><coden>IEPCBU</coden><abstract>Editors face ethical dilemmas when conflicts arise between their loyalties to readers, to authors, and to employers. They can systematically resolve such conflicts by applying an analytical decision-making process called "value analysis". This six-step process enables editors to take advantage of a model to rank core values and resolve the issue in favor of the more important value. An examination of codes of ethics of communication-related professional organizations identified ten core values to use in applying the model.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/47.661631</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | ISSN: 0361-1434 |
| ispartof | IEEE transactions on professional communication, 1998-03, Vol.41 (1), p.58-65 |
| issn | 0361-1434 1558-1500 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_195299633 |
| source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
| subjects | Business ethics Collaborative work Contracts Decision making Decision making models Editors Error correction Ethics File editors Human computer interaction Missiles Personnel Professional communication Protection Remuneration Scheduling Studies Value analysis |
| title | Ethics for editors: an analytical decision-making process |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T03%3A25%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ethics%20for%20editors:%20an%20analytical%20decision-making%20process&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20professional%20communication&rft.au=Allen,%20L.&rft.date=1998-03-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=58&rft.epage=65&rft.pages=58-65&rft.issn=0361-1434&rft.eissn=1558-1500&rft.coden=IEPCBU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/47.661631&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E328716%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195299633&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=661631&rfr_iscdi=true |