Life cycle assessment of biodiesel produced by the methylic-alkaline and ethylic-enzymatic routes

A comparative environmental impact analysis of the soybean biodiesel production by two different technologies was done in this study. The production routes evaluated were the alkali-catalyzed (catalyst: sodium hydroxide) methylic transesterification and the enzyme-catalyzed (catalyst: lipase) ethyli...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Fuel (Guildford) 2017-11, Vol.208, p.329-336
Hauptverfasser: Cristina Santos de Mello, Marcia, Gomes D'Amato Villardi, Hugo, Ferreira Young, André, Luiz Pellegrini Pessoa, Fernando, Medeiros Salgado, Andrea
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A comparative environmental impact analysis of the soybean biodiesel production by two different technologies was done in this study. The production routes evaluated were the alkali-catalyzed (catalyst: sodium hydroxide) methylic transesterification and the enzyme-catalyzed (catalyst: lipase) ethylic transesterification. In an early work, simulations of the biodiesel production processes with the software Aspen HYSYS, from AspenTech Inc., were carried out. Now, a life cycle assessment (LCA) of the entire biodiesel production chain is done. The inventories related to each production subsystem were developed based on the mass and energy balances obtained from the simulations and on literature information. The results clearly indicated the best environmental performance of ethanol over methanol and of the enzymatic technology over the traditional alkaline technology, but also demonstrated some bottlenecks that should be attacked in a seek for more sustainable solutions.
ISSN:0016-2361
1873-7153
DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2017.07.014