ALTERNATIVE EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES: A CALL TO ARMS

When Title VII of the Civil Rights Act was amended fifteen years ago, it explicitly allowed employers to be liable for refusing to adopt alternative employment practices. This article discusses the unstructured interview, which is the most common hiring technique. Cognitive ability tests provide a d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Labor law journal (Chicago) 2007-04, Vol.58 (1), p.39
Hauptverfasser: Rudin, Joel P, Gover, Kathryn L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:When Title VII of the Civil Rights Act was amended fifteen years ago, it explicitly allowed employers to be liable for refusing to adopt alternative employment practices. This article discusses the unstructured interview, which is the most common hiring technique. Cognitive ability tests provide a demonstrably better alternative causing less disparate impact. Then it turn to informal mentoring, the most common promotion technique. Assessment centers provide a demonstrably better alternative causing less disparate impact. When organizations update their hiring and promotion practices, they will be insulated from disparate impact lawsuits in two ways. First, they will more readily be able to demonstrate that their employment practices are job-related and consistent with business necessity. Second, they will have less disparate impact. They will have no choice but to hire and promote a more diverse workforce, because they never had valid reasons to screen out so many women and minorities.
ISSN:0023-6586