AN EXAMINATION OF THE YIELDS OF CORPORATE BONDS AND STOCKS - COMMENT AND REPLY

NORGAARD USES U.S. DATA FOR THE PERIOD 1926-1969 TO REJECT THE HYPOTHESIS THAT THE HIGHER MEAN YIELD OF STOCKS IS OFFSET BY THE LOWER VARIANCE OF YIELDS OF BONDS. HE CONCLUDES THAT NEITHER A BOND PORTFOLIO OR A MIXED PORTFOLIO IS APPROPRIATE FOR THE INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR. MC CALLUM MAKES 2 POINTS R...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of finance (New York) 1977-03, Vol.32 (1), p.203
Hauptverfasser: McCallum, John S, Norgaard, Richard L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:NORGAARD USES U.S. DATA FOR THE PERIOD 1926-1969 TO REJECT THE HYPOTHESIS THAT THE HIGHER MEAN YIELD OF STOCKS IS OFFSET BY THE LOWER VARIANCE OF YIELDS OF BONDS. HE CONCLUDES THAT NEITHER A BOND PORTFOLIO OR A MIXED PORTFOLIO IS APPROPRIATE FOR THE INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR. MC CALLUM MAKES 2 POINTS REGARDING THE NORGAARD STUDY. FIRST, THE UNANTICIPATED UPWARD BOND YIELD MOVEMENT OVER THE SAMPLE PERIOD RESULTS IN A DOWNWARD BIAS IN THE MEAN. SECOND, THE BOND SAMPLE IS NOT REPRESENTATIVE OF INSTITUTIONAL BOND PURCHASING BEHAVIOR. UNANTICIPATED INTEREST RATE MOVEMENT AND HEDGING TENDENCIES ON THE PART OF INSTITUTIONS ARE FACTORS THAT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED. TABLE. REFERENCES.
ISSN:0022-1082
1540-6261