Postoperative pain relief following abdominal operations: A prospective randomised study of comparison of patient controlled analgesia with conventional parenteral opioids
BACKGROUND: Parenteral opioids are traditionally used for pain management following abdominal operations. Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) is replacing the conventional method for postoperative pain relief nowadays. AIMS: To find out the effectiveness of PCA in postoperative pain relief following...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Indian journal of surgery 2005-01, Vol.67 (1), p.34 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | BACKGROUND: Parenteral opioids are traditionally used for pain
management following abdominal operations. Patient Controlled Analgesia
(PCA) is replacing the conventional method for postoperative pain
relief nowadays. AIMS: To find out the effectiveness of PCA in
postoperative pain relief following abdominal operations. SETTINGS AND
DESIGN: This prospective randomised study was conducted in the
Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research,
Pondicherry, India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-two consecutive
patients undergoing abdominal operations were randomly divided into PCA
group (n=32) who received intravenous PCA morphine and IM group (n=30)
who received conventional intramuscular morphine in the postoperative
period. Morphine consumption, pain relief, detailed pulmonary function
tests and side-effects of morphine were assessed. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:
This was performed by "Epi Info 2000 version 6". Chi-square and
Students 't' tests were used to relate the variables. RESULTS: The
total morphine consumption of the PCA group was significantly lesser
than IM group (mean 30.84 mg versus 37.36 mg P-0.015) and it was less
at different intervals in the postoperative period. The PCA group had
better pain relief when compared to the IM group (mean pain score 3.42
versus 4.97 P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0972-2068 0019-5650 0973-9793 |