Laparoscopic approach to benign esophageal disorders
Background: The technique of laparoscopic surgery (LS) has taken rapid strides over the past decade. Though the biliary tract has been the main focus of LS, the surgical treatment of benign esophageal disease is an area of growing interest. In this article we outline our experience using LS in the t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Indian journal of surgery 2004-01, Vol.66 (1), p.36 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: The technique of laparoscopic surgery (LS) has taken
rapid strides over the past decade. Though the biliary tract has been
the main focus of LS, the surgical treatment of benign esophageal
disease is an area of growing interest. In this article we outline our
experience using LS in the treatment of benign esophageal diseases.
Material and Methods: From March 1999 to February 2003, 60 patients
have been operated upon using laparoscopic technique. Thirty-six
patients had gastro esophageal reflux disease (GERD) with or without a
sliding hiatus hernia, 8 patients had a paraesophageal hernia (PEH) and
16 patients had achalasia cardia. Patients were worked up by an upper
gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy, a barium study and a routine
preoperative evaluation. All patients with achalasia and 5 with GERD
also under went an esophageal manometry. The patients were operated
under general anesthesia. The placements of ports for all patients were
the same. The pattern of dissection was similar for patients with GERD
and PEH but was modified in patients with achalasia. Patients were
started on a liquid diet on the first postoperative day and were then
maintained on a soft diet for 3 weeks. The first follow up was 1 month
after surgery and then every 3rd month for the 1st year and then 6
monthly thereafter. Results: The operating time for the GERD and PEH
group ranged from 90 to 240 minutes (mean 120) and for the achalasia
group from 120 to 180 minutes (mean 140). Intraoperative complications
included 2 pneumothoracis in the GERD patients, 2 mucosal tears in
patients with achalasia. One patient with GERD had an esophageal
perforation during passage of an esophageal bougie; this resulted in an
empyema, which needed intercostal drainage. Postoperative stay ranged
from 3 to 5 days. Delayed complications in the GERD patients included
severe "gas bloat" in 1, recurrent stricture in 1 and 1 patient had
undiagnosed gastric dysmotility, which worsened after surgery. Four
patients with GERD have been lost to follow up. Twenty nine patients
with GERD and all 8 patients of PEH are relieved of symptoms. Fifteen
of sixteen patients with achalasia have normal swallowing.
Conclusions: On account of the good results obtained, LS is an ideal
method for treating patients with benign esophageal disorders. Patients
with GERD need careful preoperative evaluation for optimizing results.
PEH, though more difficult to treat than GERD, gives good results as
experience increases. Laparo |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0972-2068 0019-5650 0973-9793 |