Group Size and the Free-Rider Hypothesis: A Re-Examination of Old Evidence from Churches: Reply to Zaleski and Zech
This paper replies to the comment by Zaleski and Zech on my Lipford (1995) paper, in which I examined the relationship between free riding and group size. In this reply, I demonstrate that my original estimate is not misspecified because of a scaling problem and argue that the effects of any omitted...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Public choice 1996-09, Vol.88 (3/4), p.413-416 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This paper replies to the comment by Zaleski and Zech on my Lipford (1995) paper, in which I examined the relationship between free riding and group size. In this reply, I demonstrate that my original estimate is not misspecified because of a scaling problem and argue that the effects of any omitted variables are likely minor, if present. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0048-5829 1573-7101 |
DOI: | 10.1007/BF00153242 |