Artificial selection in guppies: male and female phenotypes produced by inter‐ and intrasexual selection

Inter‐ and intrasexual selection are often assumed to push phenotypes in similar directions, but this must not always be the case. The current study used two artificial selection treatments in an attempt to disentangle the effects of inter‐ and intrasexual selection in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of zoology (1987) 2017-10, Vol.303 (2), p.99-106
Hauptverfasser: Van Eeckhoven, J., Huyghe, K., Van Damme, R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Inter‐ and intrasexual selection are often assumed to push phenotypes in similar directions, but this must not always be the case. The current study used two artificial selection treatments in an attempt to disentangle the effects of inter‐ and intrasexual selection in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). The first artificial treatment (inter) was maintained by selecting males that were most appealing to prospective females; in the second treatment (intra), only the most dominant males were allowed to reproduce. Male morphology, aggression, and reproductive behaviour, as well as female choice and reproductive behaviour were compared between intra‐ and inter‐treatment. After three generations of artificial selection, inter‐males varied more in their orange colouration pattern than did intra‐males. This may indicate that male orange colouration is subject to negative frequency dependent selection by means of female choice in the inter‐treatment. Females preferred inter‐males, regardless of their own selection history. These results question the seldom tested assumption that intra‐ and intersexual selection reinforce the same characters. The lack of direct benefits for choosing a dominant male are hypothesized to be at the basis of this discrepancy, since male guppies do not defend territories and do not provide resources to mates. It is often presumed that females prefer dominant males as mates, as they are thought to be genetically superior to their subordinate counterparts. However, we show that male‐male competition and female choice should not always be expected to push phenotypes in the same direction. In artificially selected lines of guppies, females consistently preferred males selected for attractiveness over males selected for dominance. Additionally, these preferred males showed a higher variance in their amount of orange colouration and performed more sigmoid displays. We suggest a lack of direct benefits to be at the basis of the discrepancy between inter‐ and intrasexual selection in guppies.
ISSN:0952-8369
1469-7998
DOI:10.1111/jzo.12475