Frege, fiction and force

Discussion of Frege's theory of fiction has tended to focus on the problem of empty names, and has consequently missed the truly problematic aspect of the theory, Frege's commitment to the view that even fictional sentences that contain no empty names fail to refer. That claim prima facie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Synthese (Dordrecht) 2017-09, Vol.194 (9), p.3669-3692
1. Verfasser: Munton, Jessie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Discussion of Frege's theory of fiction has tended to focus on the problem of empty names, and has consequently missed the truly problematic aspect of the theory, Frege's commitment to the view that even fictional sentences that contain no empty names fail to refer. That claim prima facie conflicts with his commitment to the cognitive transparency of sense, and the determination of reference by sense. Resolving this tension compels us to recognize that fiction for Frege is a special kind of force, and that words express a sense capable of picking out a referent only in the presence of the appropriate assertoric force. In effect, Frege's theory of fiction reveals his commitment to an act-centered rather than an expression-centered semantics.
ISSN:0039-7857
1573-0964
DOI:10.1007/s11229-016-1117-x