Gaussian Fitness Functions for Optimizing Analog CMOS Integrated Circuits

Analog CMOS integrated circuits (ICs) designs depend typically on designer knowledge and experience, as such problems are multivariate and multiobjective, presenting many combinations of input variables to be investigated in order to meet the required specifications. Nowadays, the a posteriori appro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on computer-aided design of integrated circuits and systems 2017-10, Vol.36 (10), p.1620-1632
Hauptverfasser: Alves de Lima Moreto, Rodrigo, Thomaz, Carlos Eduardo, Pinillos Gimenez, Salvador
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Analog CMOS integrated circuits (ICs) designs depend typically on designer knowledge and experience, as such problems are multivariate and multiobjective, presenting many combinations of input variables to be investigated in order to meet the required specifications. Nowadays, the a posteriori approach is widely used to perform the optimization processes of analog CMOS ICs using evolutionary algorithms. However, these techniques are not totally able to explore potential solutions in specific regions of the Pareto front. Designers then have difficulty in choosing the best solution capable of achieving all desired specifications simultaneously among all the ones found. In this context, the a priori approach using fitness functions has become an important alternative method to overcome these issues of the a posteriori methodology. This paper aims to compare different fitness function profiles used in the a priori optimization processes to boost the effectiveness of the search processes in relation to robustness, accuracy, and yield in analog CMOS ICs designs. We show that the Gaussian profile, proposed here, applied to the lower limit, center value, and upper limit fitness functions is able to improve all the a priori optimization evolutionary techniques investigated, including the genetic, imperialist competitive, and shuffled frog leaping algorithms.
ISSN:0278-0070
1937-4151
DOI:10.1109/TCAD.2017.2661804