Local Action Groups and Rural Sustainable Development. A spatial multiple criteria approach for efficient territorial planning

•A MC-SDSS was applied to five LAGs to aid allocation of the EAFRD budget.•A set of rural sustainability indicators was implemented and used as data input.•TOPSIS provided the sustainability ranking of the study area’s municipalities.•DRSA identified the decisional rules for allocating the EAFRD bud...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Land use policy 2016-12, Vol.59, p.12-26
Hauptverfasser: Ottomano Palmisano, Giovanni, Govindan, Kannan, Boggia, Antonio, Loisi, Rosa Viviana, De Boni, Annalisa, Roma, Rocco
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•A MC-SDSS was applied to five LAGs to aid allocation of the EAFRD budget.•A set of rural sustainability indicators was implemented and used as data input.•TOPSIS provided the sustainability ranking of the study area’s municipalities.•DRSA identified the decisional rules for allocating the EAFRD budget. Rural Sustainable Development is a very important topic under the European Union policy, and it is currently promoted through the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development 2014–2020. This fund is managed at sub-regional level by the Community-Led Local Development approach that involves Local Action Groups in order to promote the objectives of Rural Sustainable Development within rural municipalities. Each Local Action Group applies the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats analysis in order to identify for its own rural municipalities the strategic elements to which it will allocate the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development budget. Nevertheless, this analysis has some general shortcomings, including difficulties in managing a large number of Strength and Weakness factors. In addition, the importance of each factor cannot be measured quantitatively, and the same factor may be characterized both as a Strength and a Weakness. Further difficulties may occur in the case of partnerships between different Local Action Groups, such as disagreement about whether a given factor is a Strength or a Weakness, lack of information about the relationships between Strength and a Weakness factors and decision alternatives, as well as impossibility of ranking the decision alternatives. Thus, this research aims to overcome the drawbacks of the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats analysis and to support Local Action Group partnerships in the sustainability evaluation of their rural municipalities, and therefore to aid the identification of a common Rural Sustainable Development strategy to allocate the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development budget. This decision problem was tackled by applying a Multiple Criteria Spatial Decision Support System that integrates a Geographic Information System with the Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding methods “Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution” and “Dominance-based Rough Set Approach”. In order to demonstrate the validity of this methodological approach, this Multiple Criteria Spatial Decision Support System was applied to a study area of thirteen rural municipalit
ISSN:0264-8377
1873-5754
DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.08.002