Two-phase flow pressure drop in superhydrophobic channels

•Significant drag reduction is achieved for two-phase flow in superhydrophobic channels.•Drag reduction is approximately 10% greater with two-phase than single-phase flow.•Drag reduction increases with vapor fraction up to fractions of approximately 0.03. Superhydrophobic surfaces have been shown to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of heat and mass transfer 2017-07, Vol.110, p.515-522
Hauptverfasser: Stevens, Kimberly A., Crockett, Julie, Maynes, Daniel R., Iverson, Brian D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Significant drag reduction is achieved for two-phase flow in superhydrophobic channels.•Drag reduction is approximately 10% greater with two-phase than single-phase flow.•Drag reduction increases with vapor fraction up to fractions of approximately 0.03. Superhydrophobic surfaces have been shown to reduce drag in single-phase channel flow; however, little work has been done to characterize their drag-reducing ability found in two-phase flows. Adiabatic, air-water mixtures were used to explore the influence of hydrophobicity on two-phase flows and the hydrodynamics which might be present in flow condensation environments. Pressure drop measurements in a rectangular channel with one superhydrophobic wall (cross-section approximately 0.37×10mm) and three transparent hydrophilic walls were obtained. Data for air/water mixtures with superficial Reynolds numbers ranging from 22–215 and 55–220, respectively, were obtained for superhydrophobic surfaces with three different cavity fractions. Agreement between experimentally obtained two-phase pressure drop data and correlations in the literature for conventional smooth control surfaces was better than 20 percent, which is within the accuracy of the correlations. The data reveal a reduction in the pressure drop for two-phase flow in a channel with a single superhydrophobic wall compared to a control scenario. The observed reduction is approximately 10 percent greater than the reduction that is observed for single-phase flow (relative to a classical channel).
ISSN:0017-9310
1879-2189
DOI:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.03.055