Mangrove allocation for coastal protection and livelihood improvement in Kien Giang province, Vietnam: Constraints and recommendations

•A mangrove allocation policy and its implementation are reviewed from the point of view of stakeholders involved in the policy implementation.•Limited understanding of the policy of contractees resulted in ineffective and inefficient aquaculture and mangrove protection in almost all areas.•Insuffic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Land use policy 2017-04, Vol.63, p.401-407
Hauptverfasser: Nguyen, Tan Phong, Luom, Thai Thanh, Parnell, Kevin E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•A mangrove allocation policy and its implementation are reviewed from the point of view of stakeholders involved in the policy implementation.•Limited understanding of the policy of contractees resulted in ineffective and inefficient aquaculture and mangrove protection in almost all areas.•Insufficient guidelines for uses of allocated mangrove areas resulted in poor mangrove protection.•Allocation of areas less than 1ha could fragment further continuous patches of mangroves, currently dissected by ponds of a range of sizes. A management policy adopted by the Kien Giang Province, Vietnam, is to allocate mangroves areas using contracts with local community members who are dependent on mangrove resources for both mangrove protection and livelihood improvement. However, community members have not made the best use of the allocated areas, and mangroves have not been well protected. The policy is due to be revised in late 2016, as is legally required. This study used mixed methods to review the policy and its implementation with respect to mangrove protection requirements and use of mangroves for livelihood improvement and to provide recommendations for sustainable mangrove management in Kien Giang. The policy and its implementation is demonstrated to be a constraint to achieving its goal. Limited understanding of the policy of contractees resulted in ineffective and inefficient aquaculture and mangrove protection in almost all areas. Permitted thinning and selective harvests led to the creation of substantial gaps and disconnections in the established mangroves, making the entire coastline vulnerable to coastal erosion. Improper technical guidance on the configuration of mangrove allocations, and mangrove protection and transplantation methods resulted in the mangrove protected areas being fragmented and vulnerable to erosion. Permitted thinning and selective harvest practices should be reviewed to ensure adequate resilience and protection of mangrove areas, especially on critically eroding areas. Proper law enforcement should be put in place to ensure contracts are adequately implemented. Allocation and/or transferal of areas less than 1ha must be discontinued in the future to avoid further defragmentation and degradation. Technical guidance on configuring allocated mangrove areas should be established and incorporated into the updated policy that would help improve the effectiveness of the policy, and address problems relating to strengthening resilience and
ISSN:0264-8377
1873-5754
DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.01.048