Greater parametric downside risk aversion
We show that, just as an expected utility maximizer with utility function u responds to a compensated increase in risk by adjusting a control variable to reduce the degree of risk aversion measured by the Arrow–Pratt index Ru=−u′′∕u′ (Diamond & Stiglitz, 1974), so the response to a compensated i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of mathematical economics 2017-08, Vol.71, p.119-128 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We show that, just as an expected utility maximizer with utility function u responds to a compensated increase in risk by adjusting a control variable to reduce the degree of risk aversion measured by the Arrow–Pratt index Ru=−u′′∕u′ (Diamond & Stiglitz, 1974), so the response to a compensated increase in downside risk entails adjusting the control to reduce the degree of downside risk aversion measured by the Schwarzian Su=u′′′∕u′−(3∕2)Ru2. We also show that, ceteris paribus, increases in Su and in Ru result in reduced exposure to downside risk and, therefore, greater demand for self-protection activities that reduce downside risk to future income. An increase from Su to Sv is characterized by downside risk-averse transformations of utility everywhere along a path from u to v, which together constitute what we define to be a parametric increase in downside risk aversion. These parametric increases yield comparative statics predictions not true if v is simply a downside risk-averse transformation of u, and predictions for incremental changes in risk preferences can be extended immediately to global changes. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0304-4068 1873-1538 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jmateco.2017.05.002 |