Laplace transform–homotopy perturbation method with arbitrary initial approximation and residual error cancelation

•A modified Laplace transform homotopy perturbation method (MLT–HPM) is presented.•MLT–HPM improves the accuracy of approximate solutions obtained by other methods.•MLT–HPM is employed to study some cases of nonlinear perturbative problems.•MLT–HPM introduces a suitable initial approximation.•MLT–HP...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied Mathematical Modelling 2017-01, Vol.41, p.180-194
Hauptverfasser: Filobello-Nino, U., Vazquez-Leal, H., Sarmiento-Reyes, A., Cervantes-Perez, J., Perez-Sesma, A., Jimenez-Fernandez, V.M., Pereyra-Diaz, D., Huerta-Chua, J., Morales-Mendoza, L.J., Gonzalez-Lee, M., Castro-Gonzalez, F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•A modified Laplace transform homotopy perturbation method (MLT–HPM) is presented.•MLT–HPM improves the accuracy of approximate solutions obtained by other methods.•MLT–HPM is employed to study some cases of nonlinear perturbative problems.•MLT–HPM introduces a suitable initial approximation.•MLT–HPM proposes to cancel the residual error in several points of the interval. This paper presents a modified Laplace transform homotopy perturbation method with finite boundary conditions (MLT–HPM) designed to improve the accuracy of the approximate solutions obtained by LT–HPM and other methods. To this purpose, a suitable initial approximation will be introduced, in addition, the residual error in several points of the interest interval (RECP) will be canceled. In order to prove the efficiency of the proposed method a couple of nonlinear ordinary differential equations with mixed boundary conditions, indeed, difficult to approximate, are proposed. The square residual error (S.R.E) of the proposed solutions will result to be of hundredths and tenths, requiring only a first order approximation of MLT–HPM, unlike LT–HPM, which will require more iterations for the same cases study.
ISSN:0307-904X
1088-8691
0307-904X
DOI:10.1016/j.apm.2016.08.003