Comparison of mapping operators for unstructured meshes
In this paper, two PDE-based mapping operators for the generation of unstructured meshes are compared. While the Winslow operator allows the construction of valid meshes for most configurations, the functional-based operators based on area, length, orthogonality and their combinations provide a fine...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Engineering with computers 2015-07, Vol.31 (3), p.579-595 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In this paper, two PDE-based mapping operators for the generation of unstructured meshes are compared. While the Winslow operator allows the construction of valid meshes for most configurations, the functional-based operators based on area, length, orthogonality and their combinations provide a finer control on the resulting meshes. Two distinct discretization methods of the operators are also compared. An original approach using a finite difference scheme on unstructured meshes is implemented and compared to a finite volume formulation. While more complex to implement and control, mainly because of the cross-derivative terms which must be carefully discretized, the finite volume method yields a more robust and stable formulation that allows dealing with sharp curvature variations of the boundaries. Finally, a criterion for the mesh smoothness which has a global definition is presented in order to compare the smoothness of the resulting mesh obtained by different operators. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0177-0667 1435-5663 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00366-014-0361-2 |