Evaluation and Error Analysis of Official Forecasts of Tropical Cyclones during 2005–14 over the Western North Pacific. Part I: Storm Tracks

Official forecasts of tropical cyclone (TC) tracks issued by the China Meteorological Administration (CMA); the Regional Specialized Meteorological Centre in Tokyo, Japan; and the Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC) were used to evaluate the accuracies, biases, and trends of TC track forecasts durin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Weather and forecasting 2017-04, Vol.32 (2), p.689-712
Hauptverfasser: Peng, Xudong, Fei, Jianfang, Huang, Xiaogang, Cheng, Xiaoping
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 712
container_issue 2
container_start_page 689
container_title Weather and forecasting
container_volume 32
creator Peng, Xudong
Fei, Jianfang
Huang, Xiaogang
Cheng, Xiaoping
description Official forecasts of tropical cyclone (TC) tracks issued by the China Meteorological Administration (CMA); the Regional Specialized Meteorological Centre in Tokyo, Japan; and the Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC) were used to evaluate the accuracies, biases, and trends of TC track forecasts during 2005–14 over the western North Pacific. Overall, the JTWC demonstrated the best forecasting performance. However, the CMA showed the most significant rate of improvement. Two main zones were discovered in the regional distribution of forecast errors: a low-latitude zone that comprises the South China Sea and the sea region east of the Philippines, and a midlatitude zone comprising the southern Sea of Japan and the sea region east of Japan. When TCs moved into the former zone, there were both translational speed and direction biases in the forecast tracks, whereas slow biases were predominated in the latter zone. Twelve synoptic flow patterns of TCs with the largest error have been identified based on the steering flow theory. Among them, the most two common pattern are the pattern with the combination of cyclonic circulations, subtropical ridges, and midlatitude troughs (CRT, 26 TCs), and the pattern of the TCs’ track that cannot be explained by steering flow (NSF, 6 TCs). In the CRT pattern, TCs move northwestward forced by the cyclonic circulations and the subtropical ridges and then turn poleward and eastward under the influence of the midlatitude troughs. In the NSF pattern, storms embedded in the southwest flow by the cyclonic circulation and the steering flow suggest TCs should turn to the right and move northeastward but instead TCs persisted in moving northwestward.
doi_str_mv 10.1175/WAF-D-16-0043.1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1924668712</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1924668712</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-2c5e07b7f43608beb33034845ad6d2451ebdfb50165df12fb04fb9c44a3e5f733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkMtOwzAQRS0EEuWxZmuJdVq_k7Kr-gAkRJEAsbQcx4ZAGpdxUqk7voANf8iXYCirmbm6upp7EDqjZEhpLkdPk0U2y6jKCBF8SPfQgEpGsnSIfTQgRcGygkp1iI5ifCWEMMnGA_Q535imN10dWmzaCs8BAuBJa5ptrCMOHi-9r21tGrwI4KyJ3Z_6AGFd26ROt7YJrYu46qFunzEjRH5_fFGBw8YB7l4cfnKxc9Di2wDdC74ztk6Jw7RAh68v8H0XYJUCjX2LJ-jAmya60_95jB4X84fpVXazvLyeTm4yy3PVZcxKR_Iy94IrUpSu5JxwUQhpKlUxIakrK19KQpWsPGW-JMKXYyuE4U76nPNjdL7LXUN479N_-jX0kFpHTcdMKFXklCXXaOeyEGIE5_Ua6pWBraZE_0LXCbqeaar0L3RN-Q-f43WU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1924668712</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation and Error Analysis of Official Forecasts of Tropical Cyclones during 2005–14 over the Western North Pacific. Part I: Storm Tracks</title><source>American Meteorological Society</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Peng, Xudong ; Fei, Jianfang ; Huang, Xiaogang ; Cheng, Xiaoping</creator><creatorcontrib>Peng, Xudong ; Fei, Jianfang ; Huang, Xiaogang ; Cheng, Xiaoping</creatorcontrib><description>Official forecasts of tropical cyclone (TC) tracks issued by the China Meteorological Administration (CMA); the Regional Specialized Meteorological Centre in Tokyo, Japan; and the Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC) were used to evaluate the accuracies, biases, and trends of TC track forecasts during 2005–14 over the western North Pacific. Overall, the JTWC demonstrated the best forecasting performance. However, the CMA showed the most significant rate of improvement. Two main zones were discovered in the regional distribution of forecast errors: a low-latitude zone that comprises the South China Sea and the sea region east of the Philippines, and a midlatitude zone comprising the southern Sea of Japan and the sea region east of Japan. When TCs moved into the former zone, there were both translational speed and direction biases in the forecast tracks, whereas slow biases were predominated in the latter zone. Twelve synoptic flow patterns of TCs with the largest error have been identified based on the steering flow theory. Among them, the most two common pattern are the pattern with the combination of cyclonic circulations, subtropical ridges, and midlatitude troughs (CRT, 26 TCs), and the pattern of the TCs’ track that cannot be explained by steering flow (NSF, 6 TCs). In the CRT pattern, TCs move northwestward forced by the cyclonic circulations and the subtropical ridges and then turn poleward and eastward under the influence of the midlatitude troughs. In the NSF pattern, storms embedded in the southwest flow by the cyclonic circulation and the steering flow suggest TCs should turn to the right and move northeastward but instead TCs persisted in moving northwestward.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0882-8156</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-0434</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/WAF-D-16-0043.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Circulation ; Cyclones ; Cyclonic circulation ; Error analysis ; Evaluation ; Flow pattern ; Flow theory ; Forecast errors ; Hurricanes ; Meteorology ; Oceanography ; Ridges ; Science ; Steering ; Storm tracks ; Storms ; Studies ; Subtropical circulation ; Trends ; Tropical climate ; Tropical cyclones ; Troughs ; Typhoons ; Warning ; Weather forecasting</subject><ispartof>Weather and forecasting, 2017-04, Vol.32 (2), p.689-712</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society Apr 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-2c5e07b7f43608beb33034845ad6d2451ebdfb50165df12fb04fb9c44a3e5f733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-2c5e07b7f43608beb33034845ad6d2451ebdfb50165df12fb04fb9c44a3e5f733</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3668,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peng, Xudong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fei, Jianfang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Xiaogang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Xiaoping</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation and Error Analysis of Official Forecasts of Tropical Cyclones during 2005–14 over the Western North Pacific. Part I: Storm Tracks</title><title>Weather and forecasting</title><description>Official forecasts of tropical cyclone (TC) tracks issued by the China Meteorological Administration (CMA); the Regional Specialized Meteorological Centre in Tokyo, Japan; and the Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC) were used to evaluate the accuracies, biases, and trends of TC track forecasts during 2005–14 over the western North Pacific. Overall, the JTWC demonstrated the best forecasting performance. However, the CMA showed the most significant rate of improvement. Two main zones were discovered in the regional distribution of forecast errors: a low-latitude zone that comprises the South China Sea and the sea region east of the Philippines, and a midlatitude zone comprising the southern Sea of Japan and the sea region east of Japan. When TCs moved into the former zone, there were both translational speed and direction biases in the forecast tracks, whereas slow biases were predominated in the latter zone. Twelve synoptic flow patterns of TCs with the largest error have been identified based on the steering flow theory. Among them, the most two common pattern are the pattern with the combination of cyclonic circulations, subtropical ridges, and midlatitude troughs (CRT, 26 TCs), and the pattern of the TCs’ track that cannot be explained by steering flow (NSF, 6 TCs). In the CRT pattern, TCs move northwestward forced by the cyclonic circulations and the subtropical ridges and then turn poleward and eastward under the influence of the midlatitude troughs. In the NSF pattern, storms embedded in the southwest flow by the cyclonic circulation and the steering flow suggest TCs should turn to the right and move northeastward but instead TCs persisted in moving northwestward.</description><subject>Circulation</subject><subject>Cyclones</subject><subject>Cyclonic circulation</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Flow pattern</subject><subject>Flow theory</subject><subject>Forecast errors</subject><subject>Hurricanes</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><subject>Ridges</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Steering</subject><subject>Storm tracks</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Subtropical circulation</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Tropical climate</subject><subject>Tropical cyclones</subject><subject>Troughs</subject><subject>Typhoons</subject><subject>Warning</subject><subject>Weather forecasting</subject><issn>0882-8156</issn><issn>1520-0434</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotkMtOwzAQRS0EEuWxZmuJdVq_k7Kr-gAkRJEAsbQcx4ZAGpdxUqk7voANf8iXYCirmbm6upp7EDqjZEhpLkdPk0U2y6jKCBF8SPfQgEpGsnSIfTQgRcGygkp1iI5ifCWEMMnGA_Q535imN10dWmzaCs8BAuBJa5ptrCMOHi-9r21tGrwI4KyJ3Z_6AGFd26ROt7YJrYu46qFunzEjRH5_fFGBw8YB7l4cfnKxc9Di2wDdC74ztk6Jw7RAh68v8H0XYJUCjX2LJ-jAmya60_95jB4X84fpVXazvLyeTm4yy3PVZcxKR_Iy94IrUpSu5JxwUQhpKlUxIakrK19KQpWsPGW-JMKXYyuE4U76nPNjdL7LXUN479N_-jX0kFpHTcdMKFXklCXXaOeyEGIE5_Ua6pWBraZE_0LXCbqeaar0L3RN-Q-f43WU</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Peng, Xudong</creator><creator>Fei, Jianfang</creator><creator>Huang, Xiaogang</creator><creator>Cheng, Xiaoping</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Evaluation and Error Analysis of Official Forecasts of Tropical Cyclones during 2005–14 over the Western North Pacific. Part I: Storm Tracks</title><author>Peng, Xudong ; Fei, Jianfang ; Huang, Xiaogang ; Cheng, Xiaoping</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-2c5e07b7f43608beb33034845ad6d2451ebdfb50165df12fb04fb9c44a3e5f733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Circulation</topic><topic>Cyclones</topic><topic>Cyclonic circulation</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Flow pattern</topic><topic>Flow theory</topic><topic>Forecast errors</topic><topic>Hurricanes</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><topic>Ridges</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Steering</topic><topic>Storm tracks</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Subtropical circulation</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Tropical climate</topic><topic>Tropical cyclones</topic><topic>Troughs</topic><topic>Typhoons</topic><topic>Warning</topic><topic>Weather forecasting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peng, Xudong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fei, Jianfang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Xiaogang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Xiaoping</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Weather and forecasting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peng, Xudong</au><au>Fei, Jianfang</au><au>Huang, Xiaogang</au><au>Cheng, Xiaoping</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation and Error Analysis of Official Forecasts of Tropical Cyclones during 2005–14 over the Western North Pacific. Part I: Storm Tracks</atitle><jtitle>Weather and forecasting</jtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>689</spage><epage>712</epage><pages>689-712</pages><issn>0882-8156</issn><eissn>1520-0434</eissn><abstract>Official forecasts of tropical cyclone (TC) tracks issued by the China Meteorological Administration (CMA); the Regional Specialized Meteorological Centre in Tokyo, Japan; and the Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC) were used to evaluate the accuracies, biases, and trends of TC track forecasts during 2005–14 over the western North Pacific. Overall, the JTWC demonstrated the best forecasting performance. However, the CMA showed the most significant rate of improvement. Two main zones were discovered in the regional distribution of forecast errors: a low-latitude zone that comprises the South China Sea and the sea region east of the Philippines, and a midlatitude zone comprising the southern Sea of Japan and the sea region east of Japan. When TCs moved into the former zone, there were both translational speed and direction biases in the forecast tracks, whereas slow biases were predominated in the latter zone. Twelve synoptic flow patterns of TCs with the largest error have been identified based on the steering flow theory. Among them, the most two common pattern are the pattern with the combination of cyclonic circulations, subtropical ridges, and midlatitude troughs (CRT, 26 TCs), and the pattern of the TCs’ track that cannot be explained by steering flow (NSF, 6 TCs). In the CRT pattern, TCs move northwestward forced by the cyclonic circulations and the subtropical ridges and then turn poleward and eastward under the influence of the midlatitude troughs. In the NSF pattern, storms embedded in the southwest flow by the cyclonic circulation and the steering flow suggest TCs should turn to the right and move northeastward but instead TCs persisted in moving northwestward.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/WAF-D-16-0043.1</doi><tpages>24</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0882-8156
ispartof Weather and forecasting, 2017-04, Vol.32 (2), p.689-712
issn 0882-8156
1520-0434
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1924668712
source American Meteorological Society; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Circulation
Cyclones
Cyclonic circulation
Error analysis
Evaluation
Flow pattern
Flow theory
Forecast errors
Hurricanes
Meteorology
Oceanography
Ridges
Science
Steering
Storm tracks
Storms
Studies
Subtropical circulation
Trends
Tropical climate
Tropical cyclones
Troughs
Typhoons
Warning
Weather forecasting
title Evaluation and Error Analysis of Official Forecasts of Tropical Cyclones during 2005–14 over the Western North Pacific. Part I: Storm Tracks
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T01%3A51%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20and%20Error%20Analysis%20of%20Official%20Forecasts%20of%20Tropical%20Cyclones%20during%202005%E2%80%9314%20over%20the%20Western%20North%20Pacific.%20Part%20I:%20Storm%20Tracks&rft.jtitle=Weather%20and%20forecasting&rft.au=Peng,%20Xudong&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=689&rft.epage=712&rft.pages=689-712&rft.issn=0882-8156&rft.eissn=1520-0434&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/WAF-D-16-0043.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1924668712%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1924668712&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true