Evaluation and Error Analysis of Official Forecasts of Tropical Cyclones during 2005–14 over the Western North Pacific. Part I: Storm Tracks
Official forecasts of tropical cyclone (TC) tracks issued by the China Meteorological Administration (CMA); the Regional Specialized Meteorological Centre in Tokyo, Japan; and the Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC) were used to evaluate the accuracies, biases, and trends of TC track forecasts durin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Weather and forecasting 2017-04, Vol.32 (2), p.689-712 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 712 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 689 |
container_title | Weather and forecasting |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Peng, Xudong Fei, Jianfang Huang, Xiaogang Cheng, Xiaoping |
description | Official forecasts of tropical cyclone (TC) tracks issued by the China Meteorological Administration (CMA); the Regional Specialized Meteorological Centre in Tokyo, Japan; and the Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC) were used to evaluate the accuracies, biases, and trends of TC track forecasts during 2005–14 over the western North Pacific. Overall, the JTWC demonstrated the best forecasting performance. However, the CMA showed the most significant rate of improvement. Two main zones were discovered in the regional distribution of forecast errors: a low-latitude zone that comprises the South China Sea and the sea region east of the Philippines, and a midlatitude zone comprising the southern Sea of Japan and the sea region east of Japan. When TCs moved into the former zone, there were both translational speed and direction biases in the forecast tracks, whereas slow biases were predominated in the latter zone. Twelve synoptic flow patterns of TCs with the largest error have been identified based on the steering flow theory. Among them, the most two common pattern are the pattern with the combination of cyclonic circulations, subtropical ridges, and midlatitude troughs (CRT, 26 TCs), and the pattern of the TCs’ track that cannot be explained by steering flow (NSF, 6 TCs). In the CRT pattern, TCs move northwestward forced by the cyclonic circulations and the subtropical ridges and then turn poleward and eastward under the influence of the midlatitude troughs. In the NSF pattern, storms embedded in the southwest flow by the cyclonic circulation and the steering flow suggest TCs should turn to the right and move northeastward but instead TCs persisted in moving northwestward. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1175/WAF-D-16-0043.1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1924668712</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1924668712</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-2c5e07b7f43608beb33034845ad6d2451ebdfb50165df12fb04fb9c44a3e5f733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkMtOwzAQRS0EEuWxZmuJdVq_k7Kr-gAkRJEAsbQcx4ZAGpdxUqk7voANf8iXYCirmbm6upp7EDqjZEhpLkdPk0U2y6jKCBF8SPfQgEpGsnSIfTQgRcGygkp1iI5ifCWEMMnGA_Q535imN10dWmzaCs8BAuBJa5ptrCMOHi-9r21tGrwI4KyJ3Z_6AGFd26ROt7YJrYu46qFunzEjRH5_fFGBw8YB7l4cfnKxc9Di2wDdC74ztk6Jw7RAh68v8H0XYJUCjX2LJ-jAmya60_95jB4X84fpVXazvLyeTm4yy3PVZcxKR_Iy94IrUpSu5JxwUQhpKlUxIakrK19KQpWsPGW-JMKXYyuE4U76nPNjdL7LXUN479N_-jX0kFpHTcdMKFXklCXXaOeyEGIE5_Ua6pWBraZE_0LXCbqeaar0L3RN-Q-f43WU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1924668712</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation and Error Analysis of Official Forecasts of Tropical Cyclones during 2005–14 over the Western North Pacific. Part I: Storm Tracks</title><source>American Meteorological Society</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Peng, Xudong ; Fei, Jianfang ; Huang, Xiaogang ; Cheng, Xiaoping</creator><creatorcontrib>Peng, Xudong ; Fei, Jianfang ; Huang, Xiaogang ; Cheng, Xiaoping</creatorcontrib><description>Official forecasts of tropical cyclone (TC) tracks issued by the China Meteorological Administration (CMA); the Regional Specialized Meteorological Centre in Tokyo, Japan; and the Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC) were used to evaluate the accuracies, biases, and trends of TC track forecasts during 2005–14 over the western North Pacific. Overall, the JTWC demonstrated the best forecasting performance. However, the CMA showed the most significant rate of improvement. Two main zones were discovered in the regional distribution of forecast errors: a low-latitude zone that comprises the South China Sea and the sea region east of the Philippines, and a midlatitude zone comprising the southern Sea of Japan and the sea region east of Japan. When TCs moved into the former zone, there were both translational speed and direction biases in the forecast tracks, whereas slow biases were predominated in the latter zone. Twelve synoptic flow patterns of TCs with the largest error have been identified based on the steering flow theory. Among them, the most two common pattern are the pattern with the combination of cyclonic circulations, subtropical ridges, and midlatitude troughs (CRT, 26 TCs), and the pattern of the TCs’ track that cannot be explained by steering flow (NSF, 6 TCs). In the CRT pattern, TCs move northwestward forced by the cyclonic circulations and the subtropical ridges and then turn poleward and eastward under the influence of the midlatitude troughs. In the NSF pattern, storms embedded in the southwest flow by the cyclonic circulation and the steering flow suggest TCs should turn to the right and move northeastward but instead TCs persisted in moving northwestward.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0882-8156</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-0434</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/WAF-D-16-0043.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Circulation ; Cyclones ; Cyclonic circulation ; Error analysis ; Evaluation ; Flow pattern ; Flow theory ; Forecast errors ; Hurricanes ; Meteorology ; Oceanography ; Ridges ; Science ; Steering ; Storm tracks ; Storms ; Studies ; Subtropical circulation ; Trends ; Tropical climate ; Tropical cyclones ; Troughs ; Typhoons ; Warning ; Weather forecasting</subject><ispartof>Weather and forecasting, 2017-04, Vol.32 (2), p.689-712</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society Apr 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-2c5e07b7f43608beb33034845ad6d2451ebdfb50165df12fb04fb9c44a3e5f733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-2c5e07b7f43608beb33034845ad6d2451ebdfb50165df12fb04fb9c44a3e5f733</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3668,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peng, Xudong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fei, Jianfang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Xiaogang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Xiaoping</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation and Error Analysis of Official Forecasts of Tropical Cyclones during 2005–14 over the Western North Pacific. Part I: Storm Tracks</title><title>Weather and forecasting</title><description>Official forecasts of tropical cyclone (TC) tracks issued by the China Meteorological Administration (CMA); the Regional Specialized Meteorological Centre in Tokyo, Japan; and the Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC) were used to evaluate the accuracies, biases, and trends of TC track forecasts during 2005–14 over the western North Pacific. Overall, the JTWC demonstrated the best forecasting performance. However, the CMA showed the most significant rate of improvement. Two main zones were discovered in the regional distribution of forecast errors: a low-latitude zone that comprises the South China Sea and the sea region east of the Philippines, and a midlatitude zone comprising the southern Sea of Japan and the sea region east of Japan. When TCs moved into the former zone, there were both translational speed and direction biases in the forecast tracks, whereas slow biases were predominated in the latter zone. Twelve synoptic flow patterns of TCs with the largest error have been identified based on the steering flow theory. Among them, the most two common pattern are the pattern with the combination of cyclonic circulations, subtropical ridges, and midlatitude troughs (CRT, 26 TCs), and the pattern of the TCs’ track that cannot be explained by steering flow (NSF, 6 TCs). In the CRT pattern, TCs move northwestward forced by the cyclonic circulations and the subtropical ridges and then turn poleward and eastward under the influence of the midlatitude troughs. In the NSF pattern, storms embedded in the southwest flow by the cyclonic circulation and the steering flow suggest TCs should turn to the right and move northeastward but instead TCs persisted in moving northwestward.</description><subject>Circulation</subject><subject>Cyclones</subject><subject>Cyclonic circulation</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Flow pattern</subject><subject>Flow theory</subject><subject>Forecast errors</subject><subject>Hurricanes</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><subject>Ridges</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Steering</subject><subject>Storm tracks</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Subtropical circulation</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Tropical climate</subject><subject>Tropical cyclones</subject><subject>Troughs</subject><subject>Typhoons</subject><subject>Warning</subject><subject>Weather forecasting</subject><issn>0882-8156</issn><issn>1520-0434</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotkMtOwzAQRS0EEuWxZmuJdVq_k7Kr-gAkRJEAsbQcx4ZAGpdxUqk7voANf8iXYCirmbm6upp7EDqjZEhpLkdPk0U2y6jKCBF8SPfQgEpGsnSIfTQgRcGygkp1iI5ifCWEMMnGA_Q535imN10dWmzaCs8BAuBJa5ptrCMOHi-9r21tGrwI4KyJ3Z_6AGFd26ROt7YJrYu46qFunzEjRH5_fFGBw8YB7l4cfnKxc9Di2wDdC74ztk6Jw7RAh68v8H0XYJUCjX2LJ-jAmya60_95jB4X84fpVXazvLyeTm4yy3PVZcxKR_Iy94IrUpSu5JxwUQhpKlUxIakrK19KQpWsPGW-JMKXYyuE4U76nPNjdL7LXUN479N_-jX0kFpHTcdMKFXklCXXaOeyEGIE5_Ua6pWBraZE_0LXCbqeaar0L3RN-Q-f43WU</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Peng, Xudong</creator><creator>Fei, Jianfang</creator><creator>Huang, Xiaogang</creator><creator>Cheng, Xiaoping</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Evaluation and Error Analysis of Official Forecasts of Tropical Cyclones during 2005–14 over the Western North Pacific. Part I: Storm Tracks</title><author>Peng, Xudong ; Fei, Jianfang ; Huang, Xiaogang ; Cheng, Xiaoping</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-2c5e07b7f43608beb33034845ad6d2451ebdfb50165df12fb04fb9c44a3e5f733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Circulation</topic><topic>Cyclones</topic><topic>Cyclonic circulation</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Flow pattern</topic><topic>Flow theory</topic><topic>Forecast errors</topic><topic>Hurricanes</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><topic>Ridges</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Steering</topic><topic>Storm tracks</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Subtropical circulation</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Tropical climate</topic><topic>Tropical cyclones</topic><topic>Troughs</topic><topic>Typhoons</topic><topic>Warning</topic><topic>Weather forecasting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peng, Xudong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fei, Jianfang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Xiaogang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Xiaoping</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Weather and forecasting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peng, Xudong</au><au>Fei, Jianfang</au><au>Huang, Xiaogang</au><au>Cheng, Xiaoping</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation and Error Analysis of Official Forecasts of Tropical Cyclones during 2005–14 over the Western North Pacific. Part I: Storm Tracks</atitle><jtitle>Weather and forecasting</jtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>689</spage><epage>712</epage><pages>689-712</pages><issn>0882-8156</issn><eissn>1520-0434</eissn><abstract>Official forecasts of tropical cyclone (TC) tracks issued by the China Meteorological Administration (CMA); the Regional Specialized Meteorological Centre in Tokyo, Japan; and the Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC) were used to evaluate the accuracies, biases, and trends of TC track forecasts during 2005–14 over the western North Pacific. Overall, the JTWC demonstrated the best forecasting performance. However, the CMA showed the most significant rate of improvement. Two main zones were discovered in the regional distribution of forecast errors: a low-latitude zone that comprises the South China Sea and the sea region east of the Philippines, and a midlatitude zone comprising the southern Sea of Japan and the sea region east of Japan. When TCs moved into the former zone, there were both translational speed and direction biases in the forecast tracks, whereas slow biases were predominated in the latter zone. Twelve synoptic flow patterns of TCs with the largest error have been identified based on the steering flow theory. Among them, the most two common pattern are the pattern with the combination of cyclonic circulations, subtropical ridges, and midlatitude troughs (CRT, 26 TCs), and the pattern of the TCs’ track that cannot be explained by steering flow (NSF, 6 TCs). In the CRT pattern, TCs move northwestward forced by the cyclonic circulations and the subtropical ridges and then turn poleward and eastward under the influence of the midlatitude troughs. In the NSF pattern, storms embedded in the southwest flow by the cyclonic circulation and the steering flow suggest TCs should turn to the right and move northeastward but instead TCs persisted in moving northwestward.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/WAF-D-16-0043.1</doi><tpages>24</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0882-8156 |
ispartof | Weather and forecasting, 2017-04, Vol.32 (2), p.689-712 |
issn | 0882-8156 1520-0434 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1924668712 |
source | American Meteorological Society; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Circulation Cyclones Cyclonic circulation Error analysis Evaluation Flow pattern Flow theory Forecast errors Hurricanes Meteorology Oceanography Ridges Science Steering Storm tracks Storms Studies Subtropical circulation Trends Tropical climate Tropical cyclones Troughs Typhoons Warning Weather forecasting |
title | Evaluation and Error Analysis of Official Forecasts of Tropical Cyclones during 2005–14 over the Western North Pacific. Part I: Storm Tracks |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T01%3A51%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20and%20Error%20Analysis%20of%20Official%20Forecasts%20of%20Tropical%20Cyclones%20during%202005%E2%80%9314%20over%20the%20Western%20North%20Pacific.%20Part%20I:%20Storm%20Tracks&rft.jtitle=Weather%20and%20forecasting&rft.au=Peng,%20Xudong&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=689&rft.epage=712&rft.pages=689-712&rft.issn=0882-8156&rft.eissn=1520-0434&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/WAF-D-16-0043.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1924668712%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1924668712&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |