Consolidation hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced stage ovarian carcinoma: a 3 year experience

Purpose Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) potentially confers significant survival benefits in the management of ovarian cancer although the long-term data remain scant. We sought to compare the survival rates of advanced stage ovarian cancer patients who were treated with primary in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology 2017-08, Vol.80 (2), p.405-410
Hauptverfasser: Mendivil, Alberto A., Rettenmaier, Mark A., Abaid, Lisa N., Brown, John V., Mori, Kristina M., Lopez, Katrina L., Goldstein, Bram H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) potentially confers significant survival benefits in the management of ovarian cancer although the long-term data remain scant. We sought to compare the survival rates of advanced stage ovarian cancer patients who were treated with primary induction therapy alone or in conjunction with consolidation HIPEC. Methods 69 ovarian cancer patients who underwent surgery and completed their primary induction chemotherapy were treated with consolidation carboplatin (AUC 10) based HIPEC and compared to a historical cohort that received surgery and primary chemotherapy alone ( n  = 69). The demographic and clinical characteristics on which we were primarily focused, included patient age, body mass index, surgery and pathology data, chemotherapy regimen, toxicity, and progression free/overall survival. Results The two patient groups’ demographic and clinical characteristics were similar ( P  > 0.05). Progression-free survival was significantly more pronounced in the HIPEC (25.1 months) patients compared to the control group (20 months) ( P  = 0.024) and there was a decreased risk of disease progression accorded to the patients treated with HIPEC (HR 2.1028; 95% CI 1.2941–3.4167; P  = 0.0027). However, we did not discern any HIPEC related overall survival advantages ( P  = 0.29). Conclusions The results from our ovarian cancer study suggest that adjunctive HIPEC proffers a significant progression-free survival advantage and a decreased risk for disease progression. There was, however, no overall survival advantage discerned by the HIPEC group. We also recognize that HIPEC remains controversial, and thus randomized studies evaluating HIPEC compared to standard chemotherapy in the management of ovarian cancer are warranted.
ISSN:0344-5704
1432-0843
DOI:10.1007/s00280-017-3376-8