Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Device: Results from a Multicenter Registry

AF Ablation After Watchman Background There have been an increasing number of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with Watchman left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) device, requiring catheter ablation (CA) for maintenance of normal sinus rhythm. In this study, we describe our experience with the fea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology 2017-02, Vol.28 (2), p.139-146
Hauptverfasser: TURAGAM, MOHIT K., LAVU, MADHAV, AFZAL, MUHAMMAD R., VUDDANDA, VENKAT, JAZAYERI, MOHAMMAD‐ALI, PARIKH, VALAY, ATKINS, DONITA, BOMMANA, SUDHARANI, DI BIASE, LUIGI, HORTON, RODNEY, BAI, RONG, SWARUP, VIJAY, CHENG, JIE, NATALE, ANDREA, LAKKIREDDY, DHANUNJAYA
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:AF Ablation After Watchman Background There have been an increasing number of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with Watchman left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) device, requiring catheter ablation (CA) for maintenance of normal sinus rhythm. In this study, we describe our experience with the feasibility and safety of CA in patients with a preexisting Watchman LAAO device. Methods This was a retrospective multicenter AF registry of 60 patients with Watchman LAAO device who underwent CA for AF. Baseline clinical and procedural characteristics of the included subjects were retrieved from review of medical records and were analyzed. Results The mean age was 72.7 ± 4.9 years and the mean CHADS2 score was 2.3 ± 0.6. All patients had successful pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The left atrial appendage (LAA) was electrically active in 34 (56%) while reentrant tachycardia and AF triggers were seen in 17 (28%) patients. Electrical isolation was attempted in these 17 patients with only 10 achieving complete LAA isolation. Repeat imaging showed new peri‐device leaks in 30% (12/40) patients, while new significant peri‐device leaks (≥5 mm) were noted in 10% (10/40) of patients after RFA, respectively, requiring continuation of oral anticoagulation. There were a higher proportion of patients with severe peri‐device leaks (≥5 mm) after LAA isolation. However, >50% of those leaks sealed off on follow‐up transesophageal echocardiogram. Conclusion AF ablation is a feasible and safe in patients with preexisting Watchman LAAO device. Electrical isolation of the LAA could be difficult and when attempted can result in increased risk of short‐term peri‐device leak and recurrence of AT/AF in almost all patients.
ISSN:1045-3873
1540-8167
DOI:10.1111/jce.13148