Effectiveness of different options when teaching children basic movements due to certain handedness

During the school year, we used three basic movement teaching methods, including manual dexterity (rolling, catching, throwing), walking, running, jumping, balance, climbing and crawling, that the children did not study previously. Each training method was used with girls and boys who had ambidexter...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Physical Education and Sport 2017-06, Vol.17 (2), p.582
Hauptverfasser: Iedynak, Gennadii, Galamandjuk, Lesia, Dutchak, Myroslav, Balatska, Larisa, Herasymchuk, Andrii, Mazur, Valerii
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:During the school year, we used three basic movement teaching methods, including manual dexterity (rolling, catching, throwing), walking, running, jumping, balance, climbing and crawling, that the children did not study previously. Each training method was used with girls and boys who had ambidexterity, left and right handedness who were from 3 years old to 3 years, 5 months and 29 days. We determined the effectiveness of training for achieving a high level of mastery (capitalization of freedom of degrees or CDF) only for those students with manual dexterity. Our data showed that the results were independent of sex or handedness. Two of the training methods included movement repetition by each hand (foot, left, right), but a different sequence was more effective than repetition of movement only by the leading hand (foot direction). More movements of the CDF level were achieved by first performing non-conductive hand (foot, non-conductive direction) movements to achieve an exploration level of freedom degrees (EDF), which then lead to CDF formation but with alternate implementation of the arm and conductive hand. After the most effective method of teaching was used, girls with ambidexterity, right and left handedness achieved CDF levels of 3, 2 and 5 movements, respectively, and boys achieved 4, 3 and 4 movements, respectively. Girls made the same two movements (to throw the ball to the instructor with both hands from chest and throw objects at a distance using both hands alternately), and the boys made three (throwing objects towards horizontal and vertical targets and at a distance with both hands alternately). Using the most effective methods of learning basic movements with four-year-old children, one can achieve the best results for the CDF formation for movements of manual dexterity, and in the longer term, the development of motor function at a higher level.
ISSN:2247-8051
2247-806X
DOI:10.7752/jpes.2017.02088