Normal values for fundus perimetry with the MAIA microperimeter and short‐term repeatability evaluation
Purpose To assess retinal sensitivity by means of microperimetry and to evaluate the intersession fluctuation using the MAIA microperimeter in healthy volunteers. Methods Prospective, monocentre study. Fifty‐six healthy volunteers (age range, 20–80 years), underwent an automatic, full‐threshold micr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England) England), 2016-10, Vol.94 (S256), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
To assess retinal sensitivity by means of microperimetry and to evaluate the intersession fluctuation using the MAIA microperimeter in healthy volunteers.
Methods
Prospective, monocentre study. Fifty‐six healthy volunteers (age range, 20–80 years), underwent an automatic, full‐threshold microperimetry of the central field (custom grid, area of 10° in diameter, 37 stimulated points), with the MAIA microperimeter (CenterVue, Padova, Italy). A subgroup of 24 subjects was retested after 1 h (test 2) and 1 week (test 3) to determine the repeatability of the technique. A subgroup of 22 subjects was also tested on the OPKO microperimeter (Optos, Dunfermline, Scotland) (area of 10° in diameter, 28 stimulated points).
Results
Median age was 30 years [25.3–47.8]. The overall mean sensitivity for test 1 was 29.4 ± 1.4 dB, 29.8 ± 1.0 dB for test 2 and 29.9 ± 1.1 dB for test 3, respectively. Linear regression analysis showed a significant 0.5 dB sensitivity loss for each decade of life (r² = 0.27). In a subset of 24 subjects, the repeatability of the test performed at 3 separate visits showed a statistically significant difference between test 1 and 3 (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1755-375X 1755-3768 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2016.0397 |