OP0177 Ultrasound in The Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results from The Randomized Controlled Arctic Trial

BackgroundApplication of ultrasound (US) in the management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is rapidly growing.ObjectivesThe randomized controlled ARCTIC trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01205854) examined if the use of a treatment strategy based on structured US assessment1 would lead to impr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of the rheumatic diseases 2016-06, Vol.75 (Suppl 2), p.123
Hauptverfasser: Haavardsholm, E.A., Aga, A.-B., Olsen, I.C., Lillegraven, S., Hammer, H.B., Uhlig, T., Fremstad, H., Madland, T.M., Lexberg, Å.S., Haukeland, H., Rødevand, E., Høili, C., Stray, H., Bendvold, A.N., Hansen, I.J.W., Bakland, G., Nordberg, L.B., Heijde, D.V.D., Kvien, T.K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BackgroundApplication of ultrasound (US) in the management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is rapidly growing.ObjectivesThe randomized controlled ARCTIC trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01205854) examined if the use of a treatment strategy based on structured US assessment1 would lead to improved outcomes in RA, compared to a conventional strategy based on clinical and laboratory assessments alone.MethodsNewly diagnosed DMARD naïve RA patients were randomized 1:1 to A) an ultrasound tight control (UTC) strategy targeting clinical and imaging remission (no ultrasound power-Doppler signal) or B) a conventional tight control (CTC) strategy targeting clinical remission. Patients in both arms were treated according to the same DMARD escalation strategy, starting with MTX, then triple therapy MTX/SSZ/HCQ, then biologic DMARD if target was not reached. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a combination between 16 and 24 months of clinical remission, no swollen joints and non-progression of radiographic joint damage.ResultsA total of 238 patients were randomized, and patients with at least one follow-up visit were included in the full analysis set (UTC n=118, CTC n=112). Twenty-six patients (22.0%) in the UTC arm and 21 patients (18.8%) in the CTC arm reached the primary endpoint (mean difference 3.3%; 95%CI -7.1% to 13.7%). No significant differences were found between the groups for the components of the primary outcome, and secondary endpoints were similar (table).Table 1OutcomesUltrasound tight control (n=118)Conventional tight control (n=112)Difference (95% CI)p-valuePrimary endpoint (between 16 and 24 months) DAS
ISSN:0003-4967
1468-2060
DOI:10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-eular.3042