SAT0364 Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis in Patients Undergoing Biological Therapy

BackgroundPortugal has one of the highest prevalence and incidence of tuberculosis (TB) and latent TB (LTB) in Western Europe1. Screening and treatment is performed in Centers for Diagnosis of Chest Pathology (CDP), specifically designated by the Health Authority. Biological Therapy (BT) for Systemi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of the rheumatic diseases 2015-06, Vol.74 (Suppl 2), p.791
Hauptverfasser: Guerreiro Castro, S., Patarata, E., Gruner, H., Gomes, C., Moraes Fontes, M.F., Riso, N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BackgroundPortugal has one of the highest prevalence and incidence of tuberculosis (TB) and latent TB (LTB) in Western Europe1. Screening and treatment is performed in Centers for Diagnosis of Chest Pathology (CDP), specifically designated by the Health Authority. Biological Therapy (BT) for Systemic Autoimmune Diseases (SAID) has been associated with an increased reactivation of TB2 and national3 and international4 guidelines recommend LTB screening before therapy onset, a practice that has been followed in our Unit since 2001, when the first patient started BT. The most recent American College of Rheumatology guidelines recommend that patients with negative baseline screening should be re-screened annually4.MethodsThe aim of our study was to capture and treat LTB infections in all patients undergoing current biological treatment for SAID in our Unit. We conducted a prospective study by sending the patients a letter of referral to the CDP, requesting TB re-screening, to be followed by therapy if required. The letter explained to the patient the need for referral and contained clinical information for the CDP. Six months later, medical records were reviewed and patients were contacted telephonically when clinical information was absent or insufficient. Screening intent involved the following: 52 patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), 26 with Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS), 16 with Psoriatic Arthritis (PA), 4 with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) and 2 Seronegative Spondyloarthropathies (SS). Demographic characteristics were as follows: RA: F:M=42:10, x̄ age 59 y, x̄ disease duration 12 y; x̄ BT for 4.9 y. AS:F:M=10:16, x̄ age 47 y, x̄ disease duration 11 y, x̄ BT for 5.5 y; PA: F:M=8;8, x̄ age 55 y, x̄ disease duration 14 y, x̄ BT for 6.9 y; IBD: F:M=3:1, x̄ age 47 y, x̄ disease duration 7.5 y and x̄ BT for 3.75 y. The SS group consisted of 2 females; x̄ age 51 y, x̄ disease duration 8.5 y, x̄ BT for 4 y. BT mostly consisted of infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab or tocilizumab; 12 RA patients were on Rituximab on demand. Before BT onset, 14/52 patients with RA, 4/26 with AS and 1/16 with PA had a history of treated tuberculosis.ResultsOnly 36 out of 100 patients were screened at the CDP as a result of our study: 23 received the letter but did not read it, 19 did not receive the letter for several reasons, 3 refused to schedule but 9 promised to schedule the appointment after the telephone contact, 8 already had their follow-up appointment at the CDP within
ISSN:0003-4967
1468-2060
DOI:10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-eular.3479